Thursday, October 24, 2013

Does Gentleman John Quaglione see a problem with his branding and the TICKET(S) that he is running on ?

Is John Quaglione Now Running Against Vinny Gentile as a More Independent-style Republican ? 

Recent Quaglione mailers from the “...Republican, Independence and Conservative for City Council...” don’t mention State Senator Martin Golden  or show his picture  —  And THAT is probably a good thing for John !



Election campaigns are dynamic; and Gentleman John Quaglione's campaign for City Council is no exception. Proof of that is in the three pieces of Q-mail that I have received over the last ten days to two weeks.

For the entire early campaign, "GJQ" was running as if somebody had thrown a wet blanket over his entire operation. In his very gentlemanly way, he was being very quiet; and when seen, it was in the most self-effacing manner possible. Even if he did any campaigning on his own, that was always in the context some kind of one-on-one encounter or another  —   his now-repeatedly-mentioned door-to-door campaign or Sunday’s in the park with John or walks along Shore Road and down on the bike path. Everything on a larger scale involved appearances with his boss State Senator Martin Golden or his other boss, Golden Chief of Staff Jerry Kassar, or sometimes City- or County-wide candidates like Lhota, Hynes or Burnett. And even in the case of the latter, either Golden, Kassar or Malliotakis were in the background, but always nearby.

His recent mailings appear to be a complete departure from all of that.  They are a series of photographic and verbal presentations of the one-on-one John Quaglione  —   complete with a forceful and meaningful message that there is a doable “... To do: list” and that John Q is the guy to do it all. The visual imagery completely works with John Quaglione, as always a gentlemen, but now as the stand-alone guy, “As our new Council Member [who] will get results for our neighborhoods."

It cannot be missed that this is a change from what had gone before. The question is WHY ?  And equally germane, WHY NOW ?  The answer to the first question follows, below; as to the second, that will be for another day  —  maybe even after the election (that's called a teaser, folks).

It’s obvious that the Republican-Conservative brand has tarred the top candidate on the ticket Joe Lhota. It’s also fair to say at this time that the Republican-Conservative candidate for Brooklyn DA, Charles “Joe” Hynes, will probably lose the general election by a larger percentage than he did the Democratic Primary. Both of those guys came out of the box as strong “moderate-type” contenders; but their biggest failing is that they couldn’t effectively get rid of the Republican-Conservative albatross hanging around their necks.

As a down-ticket candidate, John Quaglione is limited in what he can do, especially given the fact that he was the GOP’s and Conservative Party’s “insiders’ insider” in the race. In the beginning, Hardhat Andy Sullivan was running in the same Council District against JQ saying exactly that, and using those very words. Running out of that kind of formation requires your blockers in front to do a lot of the heavy lifting. So far, it looks like “line” –  either Republican or Conservative, or the other big guys with lead-blocks, Lhota and/or Hynes – ain’t gettin’ it done; and I guess I should add State Senator Golden, who is not a candidate on the ballot this year, to that list, because he has been campaigning as if he were a candidate. So Quags did what he had to do,  it looks like he planted his foot, turned and took it to the outside, away from the stacked-up play in the middle of the field.

To me it looks like City Council Candidate John Quaglione has made a not-so-subtle pivot, away from the tarnished Republican-Conservative brand (where it appeared it was in the smallest type on the large-card mailer), away from his resume item of being a staff-skell for Marty Golden for twelve years and toward the look of an independent candidate running for City Council, on what just happened to be three party lines called whatever they happened to be called.  That would make Gentleman John's campaign just him being himself and pitching  that self to the people  —  especially to the independent and fair-minded Democrat voters in his district. Win, lose or draw, that’s better than plowing into a stacked up line for “No Gain”....

Now, if John Quaglione could be also independent enough to announce in a very gentlemanly way  his support for the only social conservative candidate in the race for mayor, Erick Salgado, who is running on the School Choice line  —  THAT would really shake things up.

>>>  And,  I’d probably write GJQ an even more favorable post than this one  —   sort of like what I've done for Joseph Hayon ! ! !  (btw, it’s not often anymore that you can get both JK and RG in the eye with just one poke)

20 comments:

Anonymous said...

I was at the debate. Your analysis is spot on. Only mentioned Golden once and it was in passing.

Quaglione has dumped the strategy of countering Gentile's senior democrat in the council argument with saying that he will be allies with Golden and still be able to get things done. That failed strategy sank Russo and Capano years ago....

Btw. Ouch. Jk and Rg with one poke....

Galewyn Massey said...

Did you mean to say this exactly in the manner that you did ? "...he [Quaglione] will be allies with Golden and still be able to get things done."

Do you mean by that, anybody else who's an ally of State Senator Golden normally can't get anything done.... or, is that just any Republican.... or, did you simply "misspeak" in your comment ?

Anonymous said...

Capano an Russo both said during their campaigns that it wouldn't matter if they were elected into the republican minority in the city council because they would work with Senator Golden to still get stuff done for Bay Ridge.

Quaglione is not using that line.

I posit that it was that startegy (touting their link to Golden)
that sank Capano and Russo.

Is that more clear? I'm typing this while sipping adult beverages east of Dyker....

Anonymous said...

Who is RG?

Anonymous said...

Luke, RG is your father...

Galewyn Massey said...

I am RG....

Anonymous said...

I'm sure that wasn't directed at gale. Lol!

Galewyn Massey said...

UPDATE: THE "LET'S MAKE THAT FOUR MAILERS WITHOUT MARTY MENTIONED" EDITION

Another piece of Q-mail arrived this afternoon from Gentleman John Quaglione, and it followed the same pattern as the others mentioned in the post above. Like one of the prior mailers, it contained no mention at all of the GOP or the Conservative Party either.

Galewyn Massey said...

But, if I'm RG, it must be directed at me....

Galewyn Massey said...

BACKFILL: THE “WITH FRIENDS LIKE THESE, WHO NEEDS ENEMIES ?” EDITION

We all know that Jerry Kassar can be a very rabid partisan and strongly support causes and candidates almost to the point of unreason. We also know that he seldom speaks in measured tones on things that are very important to him. That’s why, when I belatedly saw last week’s column, “Common Sense” in the Home Reporter, what Jerry had to say about John Quaglione at the end of it both perplexed and confounded me (See “Common Sense: DA Hynes” by Jerry Kassar, 10/15/13, Home Reporter-News/ Spectator [http://www.homereporternews.com/opinion/common-sense-da-hynes/article_4b6afae4-35c3-11e3-bbed-001a4bcf887a.html]). Almost as a complete afterthought, Kassar connected his main pitch for Charles “Joe” Hynes with John Quaglione’s earlier debate performance against Vinny Gentile and their support and non-support for the long-time incumbent DA. He finished that segment of the column with his version of an endorsement in the direction of Mr. Quaglione.

If you’re like me and missed it on the first go round, here is what Kassar had to say about his party’s candidate for City Council, as well as his long-time colleague: “As always, as the chairperson of the Conservative Party in Brooklyn, and as chief of staff for State Senator Marty Golden, for whom John Quaglione also works, I do not claim to be non-partisan. Even so I think most observers would agree that John Quaglione makes strong, well-prepared presentations. He has earned the consideration of all voters.”

I put it to you, THAT WAS NOT A RINGING ENDORSEMENT of John Quaglione by Jerry Kassar. Those words could as easily have been accompanied by a head nod in Quaglione’s direction or a casual shrug of Kassar’s shoulders. Can anybody explain to me what this might be all about; and whether it might be connected to the distancing between Quaglione and Golden ? All of it seemed to begin about two weeks ago.



Anonymous said...

when jk says Quaglione "earned the consideration of ALL voters" he is yanking hard on Qualglione's leash. iwish iwas a fly on the wall when jk and his "deputy" in mg's office talked all this over. the way jk works he probably bushwacked Quaglione with the column first and talked to him about it later.

Anonymous said...

They are trying to sink Quaglione. If JQ wins this race Gentile will be running against Marty next year.

Why would JK or MG really want that????

Anonymous said...

i heard from somebody that claims to know first hand that jq was promised that if he runs well against gentilie this year he'll get the nomination for city council when the seat is open again in 2017.

Anonymous said...

Promised By Who? I Doubt The Chairman Of The Republican Party Made That Promise And Marty Golden Who I Assume You Are Referrin To, May Not EVen Be In Office..

Anonymous said...

How Does One DefinE "Run Well"? If Georgea And Ray Riley Running John Q Race As Well As They Ran County Chair Race I Doubt This Will Happen Anyway.

Anonymous said...

Quaglione loses by 12 points.

It's been over for Republicans in Bay Ridge for a long time. Golden hung on because of a dirty deal with Vito Lopez.

Anonymous said...

You stated Hynes will lose election by a larger % than primary.
Gee ya really think so.
Dont Republicans usually het 44% in Brooklyn?

Galewyn Massey said...

Maybe, they "het 44% in Brooklyn," but they sure don't GET 44% in Brooklyn.

Anonymous said...

44%? The Brooklyn GOP would offer human sacrifices for 44%!

Anonymous said...

Look how much Quaglione spent on these crappy mailings:

http://www.nyccfb.info/searchabledb/ExpenditureSearchResult.aspx?ec_id=2013&ec=2013&cand_id=1721&cand=Quaglione%2c+John+F&date=&stmt=&stmt_id=&stmt_display=&TransTyp_id=F&TransTyp=Expenditure+Payments