This week both of the Op-Ed-styled columns started off on the right track with both commentators making their own references to the ambush killings of the two volunteer firefighters in the town of Webster, N.Y., allegedly committed by a past-convicted killer William Spengler, also killed at the site of his burning house on the shores of Lake Ontario —
Whereas Brian Kieran’s “We The People – After Newtown [II]” stuck to his post-Newtownian presentation throughout, Jerry Kassar’s “Common Sense – PURE EVIL” column quickly went off the rails and veered into being purely a political hack’s piece for the exclusive benefit of his two bosses, Marty Golden and Mike Long
Last week I had said that Brian Kieran had been “... all over the gun control thing and the NRA lobbying, and all the rest.” And then I continued, “He not only correctly identified it all as part of the issue of the day, he gave out the routine Democrat talking points with both moral certainty and a righteous indignation appropriate for the aftermath of the Newtown-Sandy Hook School massacre of innocents by a madman with guns. Unfortunately, there was nobody like Kassar around to slam lobs like this back over the net right at Brian’s ....”
This week with the added impetus of the shootings of the firstresponders in Webster, Mr. Kieran doubled down and even took on the Second Amendment militia argument. At first, it looked like Kassar was in a perfect position to smash what were still relatively easy lobs from Kieran, but instead of smashing Kieran’s serves directly back at the smiling Democrat’s family jewels, Kassar’s smash went straight off the court and completely out of the arena of play.
Since Kassar did initially attempt to address the issue of the shootings of the four upstate firemen, I can’t say that Mr. Kieran lucked into this week’s win by default. To the contrary, Kassar’s ridiculous attempt to change the subject to one about capital punishment almost seemed like an intentional effort to avoid a gun rights debate completely. There was no mention as to how Spengler’s neighbor Dawn Nguyen got him the Bushmaster AR-15, meaning that no law other than a complete prohibition against the guns used might have avoided the shootings of the four firemen on Lake Road in Webster. That avoidance of the real issue, which is part and parcel of the ongoing legislative battle over intensifying the panoply of Draconian gun control laws already in place in New York State, ties directly into Kassar’s employment as the Chief of Staff to State Senator Martin Golden.
You see, State Senator Golden has already been terribly embarrassed on specific gun-control issues — and he has even specifically cited the effects on unemployment in New York State if companies like Bushmaster were negatively impacted by stricter state gun-control laws. It is quite interesting that Kassar’s boss, Golden, has often tried to pivot away from his history of opposition to tougher gun-control legislation and onto arguments about post-gun-crime punishment. Plainly, this is exactly what Kassar’s argument about Mr. Spengler morphed into in his Home Reporter-Spectator column this week. So, even though the question of gun-control following the Newtown, Connecticut and now Webster, New York shootings remains the hottest issue of the day in New York City and State, Kassar can't bring himself to touch it with a ten foot pole.
As a conservative-minded independent Republican, I’m constrained to admit that Democrat Brian Kieran has yet again carried the day, even though I still believe much of his argument depends on an appeal to emotion and false historical citation, and that it does not contain the compelling logic or solid reasoning based upon historical precedent that Brian Kieran seems to think that it does.
In order to further demonstrate the full extent to which Kassar wasted another opportunity to counter Kieran’s column this week — I have to point out that the rest of the Kassar “Common Sense – PURE EVIL” column was used to shill for a New York State Conservative Party event that is no longer relevant to anything. This event referred to by Kassar as The New York State Conservative Party Annual Albany Political Action Conference is nothing but a throwback to the good old days when D’Amato, Pataki and Vacco were winning state-wide races by virtue of having the Conservative Party line.
Contrary to anything Kassar asserted in his column this week, it would be safe to say that there will be no panels or discussions at the Albany CPAC which might be relevant to the most meaningful currents in the contemporary conservative movement in or out of the Republican Party in New York or nationally. Such contemporary currents might better be found instead at the events of conservative-minded independents, Democrats and Republicans; for example, in events like those run by The Tea Party and/or the Tea Party Patriots.
2 comments:
Are the full remarks that Governor Andrew Cuomo recently made about the largely Republican-controlled State Senate’s proposed gun-control measures really a signal that the GOP Senate “leadership” is ready to roll-over on the whole gun-control issue?
Just as we noted with particularity about State Senator Martin Golden’s positions on gun-control above, Governor Cuomo has made a similar observation about what is probably going on within the GOP State Senate caucus concerning currently proposed gun-control measures and what will happen going forward (See Colin Campbell’s “BULLET POINTS – Cuomo: State Senate GOP’s Gun Control Plan ‘Misses the Mark’” in Politicker 1/7/13
[ http://politicker.com/2013/01/cuomo-senate-gops-gun-control-plan-misses-the-mark/ ]
In addition to this rather stern rebuke of the GOP for its plan to only increase penalties on illegal guns, “I don’t think their plan goes far enough.... I think it misses the mark, pardon the pun, to put out a plan that doesn’t ban an assault weapon with what we’ve seen.”
However, take particular note of these further remarks by the Governor concerning some undefined “process” that will take place: “These situations are always a process where a legislative body is sort of weighing the political pros and cons. They have to do it with a number of people.... ‘Gun control,’ call it what you want, is a highly politically contentious situation. It is polarizing on the political spectrum and we have the full political spectrum. So I think they’re going to have to make political decisions. Do they want to do something or not? I think this body – most legislative bodies – they want to get a sense for the atmosphere and the environment. They want to get a sense for how heated the opposition is, how heated the support is, and then they’ll make a decision.”
This is how Colin Campbell describes the Governor’s view of the legislative debate about gun-control, “Though he disagrees with the Republican gun control plan, Mr. Cuomo said he’s glad about the overall performance of the State Legislature at the moment.” In other words, it looks like Cuomo thinks that the Republicans in the State Senate will cave on their own gun-control plan. If not, do you think Andrew Cuomo would have said this, “I’m happy with everyone.... I’m happy with the Senate Republicans. I’m happy with the Assembly. I’m just happy. Constant state of happy.”
It could be just as easy to be Coumo's signal that he is going to fold on part of the gun control proposals, because of his own national plans ?
Post a Comment