Sunday, November 17, 2019

SO !!! What did Pope Francis say to Bishop Nicholas DiMarzio ???


What's the matter  ---  Has the cat got your tongue ?


It's hard to believe that on Friday the Pope of the One, Holy, Catholic and Apostolic Church of Jesus Christ on Earth met with the U.S. Region II bishops (the Catholic Bishops of New York State), including Cardinal Dolan, and there was so little fanfare

                                                                                    Somebody seems to have thrown a wet blanket over all of it and all of them  ---  and that somebody was attorney Mitchell Garabedian  ---  who last week called out the Bishop of the Diocese of Brooklyn,  Nicholas DiMarzio, as a pedophile


The reports on the Pope's meeting(s) with the New York bishops indicated that he spoke to them collectively and individually


When the Pope spoke to Brooklyn Bishop Nicholas DiMarzio he must have said something.....  Well, what was it ???


THE SILENCE IS DEAFENING !!!



Here's one report, it's somewhat enlightening, but it's far from  penetrating or complete  (See  "New York bishops meet pope at end of 'ad limina' visits"  by Carol Glatz [Catholic News Service], 11/15/19,  National Catholic Reporter/  Vatican    [https://www.ncronline.org/news/vatican/new-york-bishops-meet-pope-end-ad-limina-visits]).

It's clear that the publicly expressed charges against Bishop DiMarzio where part of the atmospherics of the gathering in Rome. According to the NCR report,  "During the week, while the bishops were praying at the tombs of the apostles and meeting with Vatican officials, media reports emerged concerning two of the bishops on the trip. The reports said Bishop Nicholas DiMarzio of Brooklyn was accused of sexually abusing a minor in the 1970s  a claim he strongly denied  and that Bishop Richard Malone of Buffalo would step down after an apostolic visitation of his diocese amid claims of his mishandling of abuse allegations.... Still, [Bishop of Albany Edward] Scharfenberger said, 'as the week went on, it wasn't that that wasn't there, but the focus was really on gratitude to God' and certainty that God will show them the way forward....."

So far it looks like "mum's the word" when it comes to what the Pope and DiMarzio had to talk about  ---  Let's see how this is handled next week in the Brooklyn-Queens Diocesan newspaper, "The Tablet."


26 comments:

Anonymous said...

Sounds like girls night out.

Anonymous said...

... lots of gossip and all dressed up, what could be better?

Galewyn Massey said...

UPDATE & BACKFILL: THE "BROOKLYN TABLET IS FINDING THIS 1970S DI MARZIO THING A TOUGH PILL TO SWALLOW" EDITION

"THE TABLET" COVERAGE OF THE NY BISHOPS' JOINT "AD LIMINA" VISITS TO THE VATICAN --- LARGELY FOCUSES ON DI MARZIO'S DENIAL OF THE RECENT PEDOPHILIA CHARGES, AND ON HIS FORMAL POSITIONS AND PUBLIC POLICIES ON PEDOPHILIA OVER HIS YEARS WHILE A BISHOP

This piece hardly tells much of the story about what went on in Rome last week, and whether Bishop DiMarzio was admonished, counselled or questioned in any way by Pope Francis or others regarding the disclosures by an attorney for a purported victim of DiMarzio's, while DiMarzio was a young priest in Jersey City (See "New York Bishops Make ‘Ad Limina’ Visits to the Vatican" by "The Tablet Staff," 11/15/19, The Tablet/ New York News [https://thetablet.org/u-s-bishops-ad-limina-visits-vatican/]).

Anonymous said...

over 30 cars on shore road were vandalized last night

please pass this on to MIA gounardes

Anonymous said...

Marty blocks the legislation that makes DiMarzio LLC pay.

Then diMarzio pays Marty during the going out of business sale.

Anonymous said...

651, Gounardes isn't a cop and does't run an auto body shop, what's he supposed to do about it?

Galewyn Massey said...

BACKFILL & CONTEXT: THE "DON'T BE SURPRISED IF BISHOP DI MARZIO AND HIS TEAM DON'T COLOR INSIDE THE LINES" EDITION

TWO DIOCESES TALKED ABOUT ALL THE WONDERFUL THINGS THAT BISHOP DI MARZIO DID WRT PEDOPHILIA AND PEDO-VICTIMS SINCE HE BECAME A BISHOP --- DON'T FORGET, THESE PARTICULAR ALLEGATIONS RAISED BY GARABEDIAN INVOLVE DI MARZIO LONG BEFORE THAT, WHEN HE WAS A RELATIVELY NEW PRIEST IN A JERSEY CITY PARISH

ALSO NICHOLAS DI MARZIO'S RECORD EVEN AS A BISHOP HAS BEEN CONTROVERSIAL WHEN IT CAME TO JUSTICE FOR PEDOPHILE VICTIMS OF PRIESTS --- A STATE LEGISLATOR FROM QUEENS ONCE SAID THAT BISHOP DI MARZIO TRIED OFFERING HER MONEY TO STOP ADVANCING THE KIND OF BILL THAT WOULD HAVE ALLOWED A SUIT SIMILAR TO WHAT ATTORNEY GARABEDIAN IS TALKING ABOUT BRINGING AGAINST DI MARZIO ON BEHALF OF MR. MARK MATZEK --- ALSO AS BISHOP OF BROOKLYN, DI MARZIO WAS REPORTED TO HAVE THREATENED TO CLOSE SCHOOLS AND CHURCHES IN DISTRICTS OF LEGISlATORS WHO VOTED FOR LEGISLATION ALLOWING FOR SUITS LIKE THE ONE DI MARZIO NOW LOOKS LIKE HE WILL BE FACING IN THE NEW JERSEY COURTS

Anonymous said...

Are enough parishioners around to have OLA, St Pats, St Anselms?

Anonymous said...

You left out St. Andrew's and St. Ephrem's

Galewyn Massey said...

MORE UPDATE & BACKFILL: THE "BITS & PIECES" EDITION

THE PUZZLE THAT IS "NICHOLAS DI MARZIO" IS BEGINNING TO FILL IN --- AS A YOUNG PRIEST, BISHOP DI MARZIO SERVED IN SEVERAL PARISHES IN JERSEY CITY, AT THE SAME TIME, HE ROSE IN THE DIOCESAN ADMINISTRATION IN THE ARCHDIOCESE OF NEWARK, FROM 1986 THROUGH 1999 DIMARZIO SERVED UNDER ARCHBISHOP THEODORE MC CARRICK, IN 1996 DI MARZIO BECAME AN AUXILIARY BISHOP IN THE ARCHDIOCESE OF NEWARK UNDER MC CARRICK (MC CARRICK LATER WAS MADE CARDINAL OF WASHINGTON, D.C., AND STILL LATER MC CARRICK BECAME THE HIGHEST CHURCH OFFICIAL EVER FORMALLY DEFROCKED AS A PRIEST FOR PEDOPHILIA) --- IN OTHER WORDS, IN A VERY REAL SENSE, BISHOP NICHOLAS DI MARZIO, NOW HEAD OF THE CATHOLIC CHURCH IN BROOKLYN AND QUEENS, WAS BROKEN IN BY NONE OTHER THAN THE HIGHEST RANKING KNOWN PEDOPHILE IN THE CATHOLIC CHURCH IN THE UNITED STATES.....

I HAVE SPOKEN TO SOMEBODY ASSOCIATED WITH MITCHELL GARABEDIAN, AND HE FILLED IN SOME OTHER INTERESTING DETAILS CONCERNING NICHOLAS DI MARZIO --- ONE THAT I CAN SHARE IS THAT, WHILE IN NEWARK, DI MARZIO WAS PART OF A RATHER SMALL SUPPORT GROUP FOR PRIESTS, MANY OF WHOM HAVE PUBLICLY BEEN NAMED AS SEXUAL ABUSERS.....

Galewyn Massey said...

EDITORIAL COMMENT: THE "SILENCE CONTINUES; WHILE THE 'SPOTLIGHT' ON DI MARZIO CASTS NEW LIGHT ON SOME OTHER PEDOS TRYING TO HIDE IN THE SHADOWS" EDITION

CASE IN POINT: MONSIGNOR OTTO GARCIA --- DI MARZIO'S HAND-PICKED POINT MAN TO "INVESTIGATE" CHARGES OF SEXUAL ABUSE AGAINST PRIESTS --- LIKE DI MARZIO, OTTO GARCIA WAS CHARGED IN A 2019 LAWSUIT UNDER A LOOKBACK STATUTE WITH ALLEGED PAST SEXUAL ABUSE AGAINST A CHILD BACK IN THE 1970S

This reopening of a case closed in a 2017 coverup by the so called "Diocesan Review Board" stinks to high heaven. It involves at least one prior NY Police Department executive official [remember decades of sexual abuse of children by priests all around NYC was covered up by the NYPD --- at all levels] (See "Queens pastor tasked with investigating pedophile priests for diocese accused of child sex abuse by Flushing man" by Bill Parry, 9/10/19, QNS.com [https://qns.com/story/2019/09/10/queens-pastor-tasked-with-investigating-pedophile-priests-for-diocese-accused-of-child-sex-abuse-by-flushing-man/]).

Anonymous said...

AMC ran a 5 part special last week about Robert Chambers case from the 80's. The preppy murder.
It ends with the explanation about why McCarrick paid for Chambers defense.

Anonymous said...

5 parishes within a mile of each other !!

So many alter boys. So little time.

Anonymous said...

The altar servers hardly show up anymore.

I wonder why?

Anonymous said...

639, WOW! If Robert Chambers sued the Archdiocese of New York under the New York State new pedophile lookback law, that would be news and a half.

Try this on for size, Robert Chambers' lawyer, Jack Litman, probably couldn't use the best defense and one closer to the truth, because a chunk of the defense cost was being paid for by McCArrick-types connected to the Archdiocese of New York. Maybe, when Chambers did the very brutal Jennifer Levin killing, he was a time bomb waiting to blow.

Everything about Chambers' lifestyle points to an extreme self-destructive and violent behavior pattern often associated with an experience of youthful sexual abuse.

Anonymous said...

A key player in the Robert Chambers case is Monsignor Thomas P. Leonard. Leonard admitted associating with Chambers when he was a young student, but recalled no details about their earlier interaction. Nonetheless, Monsignor Leonard helped arrange for Chambers' bail under condition that the monsignor supervise Chambers until his trial.

Monsignor Thomas P. Leonard is also a key player in the matter of the defrocked and convicted serial sex offender Edward A. Pipala. Although Monsignor Leonard could have stopped the then "Father" Pipala in his tracks after an early reported and then admitted sexual incident, Leonard stood by while Pipala was advanced in his career in the New York Archdiocese, while at the same time becoming one of the biggest serial pedophiles in the history of the New York Archdiocese.

Anonymous said...

In October 1986 when the New York Times did an article about Cardinal O'Connor's concern that Archbishop McCarrick's and Monsignor Leonard's support of Chambers might hurt Catholic-Jewish relations, or that Catholics might be seen as looking after their own, DiMarzio was incardated to Archbishop McCarrick and listed as an "Associate Pastor in Residence at Mount Carmel Church in Jersey City"; however, at that time, DiMarzio also had a long-term assignment in Washington, DC for the U.S. Catholic Conference.
It is not recorded whether DiMarzio advised or consulted in any way with Archbishop McCarrick concerning any aspect of the Chambers-Levin case or McCarrick's long-term relationship with Robert Chambers.

Galewyn Massey said...

UPDATE: THE "SERIOUSLY, THEY'RE NOT BEING SERIOUS ARE THEY ! ? !" EDITION

THE LATEST NONSENSE FROM THE FOLKS AT THE DE SALES MEDIA GROUP (NET>~) IS THEIR TRYING TO USE VERBAL SLEIGHT OF THE HAND TO CONVINCE PEOPLE THAT "CATHOLICS IN BROOKLYN... SUPPORT... BISHOP DIMARZIO" IN SPITE OF THE THREAT OF CHARGES OF PEDOPHILIA BEING LODGED AGAINST HIM BY A VICTIM FROM HIS PAST

THE LATEST REPETITION OF THE FALSE NARRATIVE THAT --- "THE BISHOP OF BROOKLYN IS STRONGLY REFUTING [AN] ALLEGATION FROM NEARLY HALF A CENTURY AGO...." IS COMING FROM JOHN QUAGLIONE'S LATEST EMPLOYER, THE DE SALES MEDIA GROUP, AND IT APPEARED ONLINE YESTERDAY


Just like the leftists on college campuses, the Diocese of Brooklyn's media arm, the DeSales Media Group, is trying a trick of deconstruction to say something that just isn't even a little bit true. In other words, the Diocese of Brooklyn is lying to the Catholics in Brooklyn and Queens on behalf of Bishop DiMarzio when it says that he has refuted anything, least of all any charges from fifty years ago.

Similarly, the quote from some cement headed buffoon, named Deacon Phil Franco, is equally part of a "Big Lie" being foisted on the faithful for the benefit of DiMarzio, and diMarzio alone --- "Deacon Franco said false allegations could be damaging to a man [DiMarzio] who has devoted so much of his ministry to fighting sex abuse.... 'It’s extremely unfair to the priests, who in these cases of false accusations are innocent; and it’s unfair to those who are legitimate victims,' he explained...."

On the other hand true allegations of the very same matter will be the end of DiMarzio’s almost lifelong hypocrisy as a priest and bishop, and at least a partial vindication for all legitimate victims.

There was at least one true line in the article, “…’If he’s proven guilty, then he will face the music,’ said parishioner Laura Caccavale….” of Our Lady of Mount Carmel Church in Williamsburg, Brooklyn (See “CATHOLICS IN BROOKLYN DIOCESE EXPRESS SUPPORT FOR BISHOP DIMARZIO” by Tim Harfmann, 11/18/19, NET [https://netny.tv/episodes/currents/catholics-express-support-for-bishop-dimarzio/]).

Anonymous said...

Interesting stuff. Robert Chambers attorney Jack Littman dies 10 years ago.
Littman got Chamber a deal 5 to 15 years. Chambers did all 15 years.
Six months after he got out he got nailed in a drug case and got 19 years. He gets out in 5 years.

Galewyn Massey said...

A FURTHER UPDATE: THE "NOT EVEN CLOSE TO REALITY" EDITION

IF BUFFALO'S BISHOP RICHARD MALONE IS ANYWHERE NEAR TO BEING AN ACCURATE REPORTER OF THE GOINGS ON IN ROME LAST WEEK, IT LOOKS LIKE THERE REALLY MIGHT BE NO HOPE FOR THE OLD TOP DOWN ROMAN CATHOLICISM AS IT IS NOW CONSTITUTED IN THE UNITED STATES --- CERTAINLY, NOT AS IT IS BEING ADMINISTERED THROUGHOUT NEW YORK STATE BY THE CURRENT CROP OF BISHOPS

IF RICHARD MALONE IS RIGHT IN HIS SERIES OF TAKE-AWAYS FROM WHAT THE POPE SAID TO THE CARDINAL AND THE REST OF THE NEW YORK BISHOPS DURING THEIR JOINT AND SEVERAL "AD LIMINA" SESSIONS AT THE VATICAN LAST WEEK, NOBODY THAT WAS THERE SEEMS TO "GET IT" AT ALL --- FROM THE POPE ON DOWN

If you want to see an example of a microphenominal version of the "Extraordinary Popular Delusions and the Madness of Crowds" look at what Malone said this crowd of frat boys in fancy dress talked about and did along with their main man in Rome (See "Malone: Pope understands difficulties, 'distress' facing Buffalo Diocese" by the staff [from the Catholic News Service], 11/19/19, National Catholic Reporter [https://www.ncronline.org/news/people/malone-pope-understands-difficulties-distress-facing-buffalo-diocese]).

Galewyn Massey said...

STILL MORE: THE "LOOSE LIPS SINK SHIPS" EDITION

A REPORT ON BISHOP RICHARD MALONE'S 11/18/19 VIDEO TAPED REMARKS THAT APPEARED IN THE VENERABLE "CATHOLIC HERALD" GIVES SOME DETAILED BACKGROUND THAT EXPLAINS THE WHAT & WHY OF THE POPE SENDING DI MARZIO TO BUFFALO TO INVESTIGATE AND REPORT BACK --- IT WAS AS MUCH ABOUT THE LEAKS FROM DIOCESAN OFFICIALS AS IT WAS ABOUT THE SEX ABUSE

Don't be fooled, this UK based paper has a U.S. presence and is all over the Diocese of Buffalo scandal (See "Buffalo bishop says Pope Francis ‘very understanding’ after scandals" by staff [from the Catholic News Agency], 11///20/19, The Catholic Herald/ Latest News [https://catholicherald.co.uk/news/2019/11/20/buffalo-bishop-says-pope-francis-very-understanding-after-scandals/]).

Obviously, DiMarzio's assignment was more about the whistleblower and the leaks from the Buffalo Diocese and less about the sex abuse in the Buffalo Diocese.

Anonymous said...

Looks like liam after another month hiatus from the public eye (rehab again after his wedding night fiasco on the streets of bay ridge) is trying again to make a name for himself. Ge had a presser with the gop assembly candidate, marko kepi, running against nicole malliotakis pick to replace her on the assembly yesterday. (Wait but liam says how "close" he is with nicole now he is taking her on with an assembly candidate over her pick). Does this mean he will also be backing another gop candidate against her for Congress?? I cant keep track of Liam's roller coaster allegiances and demons

Anonymous said...

To bad for Chambers that Littman is gone. Maybe he can get Chuck Otey.

Anonymous said...

Littman represented Chamberas?

Anonymous said...

I heard nicole say Chamberas who??? Last night

Anonymous said...

Doesn't eatin claim to be "close" with DiMarzio to?