In a stunning act of [over-reaching perhaps] Fox News legal analyst, and controversial Brooklyn ADA holdover, Anna-Sigga Nicolazzi might be getting her own new show
The ADA who prosecuted the Mark Fisher Murder Case, and arguably got a conviction of John Giuca by underhanded means, while letting a couple of guilty characters get away, is trying to find her own escape hatch on TV. --- Or maybe she's just trying to seek fame and fortune outside the Brooklyn DA's Office in the aptly, but ironically, named "Did He Do It ?"
According to a nifty little piece of digging by one of my better BSI's on the Brooklyn DA's Office stuff, Anna-Sigga Nicolazzi will be starring in a new show called "Did He Do It?" for Investigation Discovery. The production company is a mostly British outfit, Britespark Films; and if things go as planned, the show premiers in April.
HERE'S WHAT BRIGHTSTAR SAYS ABOUT ITS NEW SHOW
"Finished Production *** DID HE DO IT? *** FOR INVESTIGATION DISCOVERY, 6 X 60' *** A dynamic new true crime drama documentary series that puts the accused center stage. At the top of each episode we introduce one murder victim - and one prime suspect. *** Presented by duelling lawyers – for the Defence, Darren Kavinosky, named one of California's top 100 trial lawyers; for the Prosecution, Brooklyn DA Anna Sigga Nicolazzi, who has never lost a homicide case – we tell the story of the twisting murder investigation and trial, asking viewers, just like with a jury, to decide Did He Do It? Profiling six captivating cases, viewers are kept guessing until the final few minutes. *** Series Producers: Kim Flitcroft & Ben Fox " (See Brightspark Films Web Page / Our Work [http://www.britesparkfilms.com/portfolio/did-he-do-it-6-x-60/]).
I wonder what the chances are that "Did He Do It ?" might actually dramatize the whole process around the Mark Fisher case ? I'm sure that some other Hollywood insiders will be looking closely at that one.
2 comments:
As expected, you entirely misrepresent ADA Nicolozzi's behavior in the John Giuca case. You choose a false narrative then hold onto it like a dog with a greasy bone or like Joe Hynes with an old grudge or the local drunk with a warm beer - you just can't let go. If you did any thorough research you would see that the error whether harmless or not relies primarily in Judge Alan Marrus- Joe's old buddy - whom you reference in the Perrone case to which you are also clueless.
RESPONSE: THE "SURPRISE SUNDAY MORNING ATTACK ON DECEMBER 7TH" EDITION
DOROTHY/ DORTHY DELIVERS A LONG-DELAYED COUNTER-ATTACK
NOT SO FAST DOROTHY/ DORTHY !
Here are my lines about the Fisher-Giuca case in the post above:
"The ADA who prosecuted the Mark Fisher Murder Case, and arguably got a conviction of John Giuca by underhanded means, while letting a couple of guilty characters get away, is trying to find her own escape hatch on TV...."; and
"I wonder what the chances are that 'Did He Do It ?' might actually dramatize the whole process around the Mark Fisher case ? I'm sure that some other Hollywood insiders will be looking closely at that one."
WHERE IS THERE ANYTHING THAT RATES THIS: "As expected, you entirely misrepresent ADA Nicolozzi's [sic] behavior in the John Giuca case. You choose a false narrative then hold onto it like a dog with a greasy bone or like Joe Hynes with an old grudge or the local drunk with a warm beer - you just can't let go....
There is no representation of ADA Nicolazzi's "behavior" whatsoever; and even the conclusory characterization "...underhanded means..." was introduced with the modifier, "arguably."
"...ARGUABLY..." -- get it ? Giuca's side has argued it repeatedly and they still are doing so in petitions, motions and/or appeals. The same Anna-Sigga Nicolazzi underhanded methods theme has been picked up by various writers, news organizations and a couple of legal scholars.
Post a Comment