Mentions three major incidents — including the one in Brooklyn — that authorities probably have intentionally mis-characterized to cover up acts of terrorism or other kinds Islamic ritual killing in the United States
Blog writers, Diana Sepulveda & Mona Salama, tell story of Mahuddin Mahmud, Brooklyn father of three, found burned in his basement apartment on January 9, 2014 — with his head mostly cut-off
They also sound the alarm — “...Don’t Believe The Lies” — These killings are NOT “Rental Dispute[s]” OR “Workplace Violence”
The way Ms. Sepulveda and Ms. Salama briefly tell the story of Mahuddin Mahmud’s life and death, “[He] legally immigrated to the US decades ago to start a computer software training business and became a landlord. A rental dispute occurred in January [this year] in a small Bangladeshi community in Brooklyn, NY, [which] ended in a traditional native Bangladesh attack of beheading and burning the victim....” (See “Rental Dispute? Workplace Violence? Don’t Believe The Lies” by Diana Sepulveda & Mona Salama, 10/11/14, Behind Enemy Lines - Blogging From Within [http://www.behindenemylinesradio.us/2014/10/rental-dispute-workplace-violence-dont.html]). They then described how the alleged perpetrator, a 27-year old Rasel Siddiquee, rushed to JFK Airport in an attempt to jump on a plane to return to his native Bangladesh. He wasn’t able to make good his getaway; and he was apprehended by the NYPD before he left the jurisdiction of the United States.
These women commentators then asked this rhetorical question: “Does this story sound familiar?”
They gave this immediate and well-targeted answer, “Of course it does, after the beheading of a 54-year old grandmother in Oklahoma several weeks ago. Besides the obvious common thread of a gruesome beheading, the other worrisome common thread is the government[’s] and media[‘s] handling of the story.”
MEDIA COVER-UP
What did the media say about January 2014 attack in Brooklyn ?
According to Sepulveda and Salama, “Nothing but cover it up saying a death occurred because of a rental dispute.”
They went on to acknowledge, “...Yes, a death occurred...” However, they raised this issue “... where were the details ?"
The allegations in the case are that Siddiquee BEHEADED Mahuddin Mahmud and then burned him. Even though the decapitation was not completed, it was a gruesome act, nonetheless; and together with the burning of the remains, it was an old fashioned Bangladeshi Islamic method of ritual execution.
GOVERNMENT POLICY FOSTERS MISREPORTING OF THE NATURE OF CERTAIN CRIMES — TO AVOID “ISLAMAPHOBIA”
The report of Ms. Sepulveda and Ms. Salama concludes that it is government policy that keeps the victims of this kind of violence from being properly avenged; and the public from being properly informed.
In this instance, Mahuddin Mahmud, a law-abiding citizen living in Brooklyn, did not get the respect and honor he deserved from either the police or others in city government. or by a main stream media biased by political correctness. Instead, a gruesome attack followed by a partial immolation of the victim, allegedly by an illegal Islamic thug, with the intent and purpose to kill in an ancient and ritualistic manner, was covered-up to prevent something called “Islamophobia.”
This is exactly what happened recently in Oklahoma, with the lie of that beheading's merely being an act of workplace violence, by an Islamic fanatic; and it is generally what happened not very long ago in Fort Hood, Texas, where several soldiers were killed and others gunned down in another instance of so-called workplace violence by another Islamic fanatic.
25 comments:
Happy Indigenous People's Day to all Mr. Massey's blogging friends!
MODERATION: THE "LET'S BE MODERATE IN OUR RACISM" EDITION
THE COMMENT PREVIOUSLY AT "ANONYMOUS...7:10AM" HAS BEEN MODIFIED, AND HAS BEEN ALLOWED TO STAND AS FOLLOWS:
" Anonymous said... *** Since you want to celebrate something about the generally [racial stereotypes and epithet], some who are on the dole, how about calling it 'conquered north American savages' day. *** October 12, 2014 at 7:10 AM"
Republished as modified --
be headings and racist comments.
I'm going back to the Huffington Post
Racist? Against which race?
Which race?
Duhhhh !!!
This is a republican blog.
Duhhhh ! ! ! !
What do YOU mean ?
I meant Trans-Siberians...
Where's Dorothy? Who insulted Dorothy?
IT’S TIME TO 'OUT' GENE BERARDELLI, BECAUSE BERARDELLI IS ONE OF THE MOVERS AND SHAKERS BEHIND THE BLOG TALKED ABOUT ABOVE, AND HERE’S WHAT “THEY” SAY ABOUT HIM -
“Gene Berardelli is a noted Republican election law attorney, a civil litigator, a blogger and host of Behind Enemy Lines, a internet radio show that features urban Republicans broadcasting from "The People's Republic of New York City" detailing the "fight from within the belly of the Liberal beast" on We Are America Radio Wednesday nights at 10 PM”. In his latest venture, Berardelli is still working with his old bud, Russell Gallo, but they also both seem to be working along with some Black Dude, named Wayne Dupree.
go on, keep making everything a big joke. If your not taking this serious 3 weeks before the election than
The only thing notable about Gene Berardelli as an election lawyer is how often he gets his own candidates knocked off the ballot because of his ineptitude and carelessness.
He must have been taught . . .
Before he was six or seven or eight. He must have been carefully taught.
Dorothy, glad to see you are back
RESPONSE: THE "TWO BIRDS WITH ONE STONE" EDITION
That isn't "Dorothy" over the rainbow...
It's Oscar the Grouch II -- or is it III. No, no, it's II
Who is Dorothy? If it is a joke it is a poor one. At least be funny, everyone likes funny.
In any event, just to recap: Bay Ridge Brooklyn has two Republican officials - Martin Golden and Michael Grimm - both of whom are under federal criminal investigation. How's the Senator holding up in light of the government inquiry? Has Mr. G. Kassar considered implementing a scorched earth campaign as the days wind down and they bring it home? Any fear-mongering in the plans? It didn't work with Joe Hynes but clearly the local Brooklyn bloggers have ramped up the fear and seem more then ever ready to be the willing executioners of a Southern stategy.
Speaking of thse blogs, truly they reveal one certainty:
The honroable party of George L. Clarke, Jr. is dead and gone.
It's with O'Leary in the grave.
BSI Our paper stll costs a penny Division
Dorothy, there's no place like home, but you aren't in Kansas anymore.
To Gail and
Anonymous said,,, Who is Dorothy?
Any fear-mongering in the plans? Any fear-mongering...!
REad about your guy Thompson in the October 13, 2014 editions of the Leonard Levitt blog NYPD COnfidential @ http://nypdconfidential.com/ Check it out under the heading, IN PRAISE OF DIVERSITY... Or Brooklyn DA Ken Thompson.
Your guy Thompson was supposed to get rid of the Hynes dead wood. Now he is promoting a rotten timber from way back like Eric Gonzalez at the expense of the clean like Mark Feldman. All hail for diversity!
Well that is non-responsive. I will however address in part your stream of consciousness statement.
As a preliminary matter, it is Gale not Gail. How many times does the blog administrator have to correct commenters on this point?
Second, I ask "Who is Dorothy?" because that presupposes there is a brainless scarecrow and a cowardly lion somewhere nearby. I assume you are a conflation of both. (It is already obvious who represents Frank Morgan around here.)
Third, the fear-mongering is an express reference to the reprehensible tactics used by the local Brooklyn GOP in last year's Hynes' Republican run for District Attorney. No one in your Party nor at this bog has ever renounced those actions. The vitriol and racial animus that permeated the campaign was horrendous. Perhaps you are not old enough to remember the streets of Crown Heights in 1991 or 18th Avenue in Bensonhurt around 1987. But I do. I lived through them. I saw last year your local Party along with Hynes' insiders try to pick the scar already healed and open that wound of hate from those years. Why? For an election? And of a life-long Democrat who never even had respect for your Party to begin with. What saddens me most is that the so-called BYR's - those whom we would expect to be the future of the Party and speak out against such behavior became instead willing participants. In the end all that was accomplished by those actions was the ruination of a man's legacy. Was it worth it?
"Your guy Thompson"? You clearly have no idea who I am. No idea. No idea at all.
Sorry I meant "blog" not "bog" I must have been channeling Emily Dickenson . . . to an admiring bog
Well if this isn't Mr. Massey's finest edition of 'Now you see it Now you don't' then tell me what is! Written statements gone, vanished as if they never existed and they're truly nowhere to be found. I'm thinking that in another life time Mr. Massey once worked for a Deputy on a palatial floor in a building on Jay Street in an office overlooking the Brooklyn Bridge where a portrait of St. Thomas More hung but its occupant always called him Saint Thomas Aquinas not caring about the important doctrinal difference between the two. Or perhaps Mr. Massey was once a Deputy himself. Where else could he have learned to "disappear" written statements as thoroughly as we have presently seen? In that office on that palatial floor overlooking the Brooklyn Bridge it's occupant called the eradicating of statements "releasing the evidence." This made it seem official and important work especially when instructing underlings to complete such tasks. I wonder if Mr. Massey calls it that too?
RESPONSE: THE "FIXING PROBLEMS CREATED BY OTHERS" EDITION
AS MODERATOR OF THIS BLOG, IF I SEE A SERIOUS PROBLEM WITH WHAT SOMEONE MAKING A COMMENT HAS WRITTEN, I WILL MODERATE IT.
SOMETIMES THAT MEANS A SIMPLE EDITING OF THE PROBLEMATIC ITEM, OTHERS A COMPLETE REMOVAL
Two items were removed above. One initiated the discussion, the other responded. Both contained questionable statements that might expose both this blog and/or the writers to opprobrium and/or penalty.
smart move Gail
JD
come back Dorothy
This ‘person’ is not a real ‘Dorothy.’ To start, mention of that special name bugs her out. Next, no ruby shoes anywhere in sight. Most important of all, for her not to mention the ‘Tin Man’ in her most recent comment was the clincher for me.
This ‘Dorothy’ is threatened by anybody that is tough, squeaks like a rusty carriage and doesn’t appear, I say ‘appear,’ to have a heart. If she knew anything about Brooklyn Republican blogging over the last five years, she’d know how much some of us liked Dewey Bunnell’s haunting words:
‘Sometimes late
When things are real
And the people share the gift of gab
Between themselves
Some are quick
To take the bait
And the catch the perfect prize
That waits among the shells [skels]
But Oz never did give nothing to the Tin Man
That he didn't, didn't already have
And Cause never was the reason for the evening
Or the tropic of Sir Galahad’
You can call this one a ‘Dorothy’ all you want.
I don’t happen to think so.
TM
That's juvenile. It's sad to see a reputable blog diminished by such nonsense.
Post a Comment