Monday, March 27, 2023

January 6th watershed moment possible today --- in the now-ongoing trial of several J6 Defendant-Members of the "Proud Boys" --- a key FBI informant will be examined and testify in open court about the extent of her activities before, during and since the so-called J6 "Insurrection"

 

Today, defense attorneys are scheduled to question Jen Loh, amid growing questions about the extent to which FBI informants, aka "confidential human sources" (CHS), knew about the Capitol riot, and whether they might have led and encouraged the crowd at the Capitol during the events of January 6, 2021.... 


One of the shocking revelations during a J6 trial of several of the "Proud Boys" last week was that at least one FBI informant, Jen Loh, a member of Latinos for Trump, had been in close contact with the defendants  ---  and their legal team  ---  throughout the instant trial, potentially compromising the defendants' constitutional rights.....  



If the government had spied on discussions among the defendants and their lawyers by using an informant, that would violate the attorney-client privilege and the Sixth Amendment.  

Even  CNN is now reporting that:  "Over the past year, Texas woman Jen Loh has been in touch with several Proud Boys now on trial for seditious conspiracy, talking with the members of the far-right group and their defense counsel about the case and suggesting possible witnesses and attorneys who could help....  All the while, Loh was also a paid FBI informant....  That revelation threw a wrench into the ongoing trial this week in federal court in Washington, DC, when defense counsel learned of her relationship with the government...."  (See "FBI informant speaks with CNN about her role in Proud Boys trial"  by Holmes Lybrand and , 3/24/2023,  CNN/ Politics    [https://www.cnn.com/2023/03/24/politics/proud-boys-fbi-informant/index.html]). 


5 comments:

Anonymous said...

It was an insurrection.

Anonymous said...

939, not even close... Obviously, you don't know what an "insurrection" is, because the events of J6 were in no way any kind of insurrection by anybody involved.





Anonymous said...

1234, it obviously was an insurrection.

Anonymous said...

259, you can't name anything that is/was "obvious" about any part of the events of J6-2021 that is within the legal definition of "insurrection":

"18 USC §2383. Rebellion or insurrection ... Whoever incites, sets on foot, assists, or engages in any rebellion or insurrection against the authority of the United States or the laws thereof, or gives aid or comfort thereto, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than ten years, or both; and shall be incapable of holding any office under the United States...."

Anonymous said...

539, yes, sounds like insurrection.
If Greens, Dems, or orthopedic shoe inserts pulled that **** at the Capitol you'd be screaming your brunch off.