Special Counsel Jack Smith (who obviously wants to be known by that venerable stage name --- "Whispering Jack Smith") made his motion yesterday --- and it said the government's hoped-for protected materials included 'sensitive and confidential information,' including personal identifiable information, information that reveals investigative techniques, non-public information relating to potential witnesses, and personal information contained on electronic devices and accounts...."
".... The DOJ filed a motion for a protective order on Friday to prevent the ex-president from leaking the top secret materials that will be shared with his legal team during the prosecution for his alleged mishandling of documents at Mar-a-Lago...." >>> but here is the real scope of that particular prohibition: ".... The Discovery Materials, along with any information derived therefrom, shall not be disclosed to the public or the news media, or disseminated on any news or social media platform, without prior notice to and consent of the United States or approval of the Court....”
Jack Smith and his rabid team of Biden/Garland Trump persecutors want to conduct a secret star-chamber-like trial, limiting the public's right to see all of it --- especially not to know about all of the so-called evidence against President Trump --- or even to know or hear how the prosecution and defense will be handling and discussing all the so called evidence in the case
Mostly the media is talking >>> about yesterday's motion by the DOJ for a gag order specifically against Trump and his team's revealing and/or talking about the evidence in the Mar-a-Lago-Bedminster-NJ-Washington-D.C. classified documents case <<< like it's a good thing
And this is what they want everybody to think it's all about:
"... 'sensitive and confidential information,' including personal identifiable information, information that reveals investigative techniques, non-public information relating to potential witnesses, and personal information contained on electronic devices and accounts...."
What they are really talking about is cutting-off the public's right to know what the evidence really is in this so-called national security/ classified documents case against former President Trump
This is exactly how the Daily Beast tried to skew the story in its lead paragraph: "... The Justice Department doesn’t trust Donald Trump with the classified records involved in his prosecution. The DOJ filed a motion for a protective order on Friday to prevent the ex-president from leaking the top secret materials that will be shared with his legal team during the prosecution for his alleged mishandling of documents at Mar-a-Lago. Under the order, Trump would only be allowed to see the 31 documents presented by the DOJ in the case with his attorneys present. While he might not get his boxes back, as he’s been pleading for on Truth Social, the motion suggests he will be able to access some of the records seized from his Florida estate. Trump-appointed Judge Aileen Cannon referred the motion for review to Judge Bruce Reinhart, who approved the initial search of Mar-a-Lago...."
IN REALITY THIS IS WHAT JACK SMITH AND HIS GOONS HAVE ALSO ASKED FOR.....
The protective order would specifically mandate that Trump himself can only review the 31 classified documents that the federal prosecutors intend to use in the case >>> while Trump lawyers is in the presence of his attorneys.
Furthermore. the Smith's motion seeks a proposed order that --- “Defendants, Trump and Nauta shall only have access to Discovery Materials under the direct supervision of Defense Counsel or a member of Defense Counsel’s staff [and that] Defendants shall not retain copies of Discovery Material. Defendants may take notes regarding Discovery Materials, but such notes shall be stored securely by Defense Counsel."
And here's the kicker in the Smith motion: “The Discovery Materials, along with any information derived therefrom, shall not be disclosed to the public or the news media, or disseminated on any news or social media platform, without prior notice to and consent of the United States or approval of the Court....”
According to some reports the motion will be reviewed by Judge Bruce Reinhart, who signed the original Mar-a-Lago subpoena.
SAME LANGUAGE AS WAS USED IN BRAGG'S CASE IN STATE COURT IN NYC
Ir is very interesting that >>> The language used in the federal court filing by Special Counsel Smith's tean was quite similar to the language that had been used in the former president's hush money case in New York, which barred him from sharing evidence in the case wherein Trump had been indicted in Manhattan earlier this year for an alleged hush money payment made on behalf of Trump to porn star Stormy Daniels in 2016.
Collusion and conspiracy among the prosecutors ??? Hmmmm !!! Could be.....
8 comments:
nobody comes to this site hot takes on national news. we want the scoop on nick chamberas. i heard he had a bad fall at starbucks
Speaking of Nick I thought he keeps saying how he and niccole are so close and people saying malliotakis cant stand him are lying? Hey nick then why did nicole shun your guy Avery and endorse Ari??
Everybody knows that Malliotakis is soft in the head sometimes, that politically she can be dumb as a post, and that her sense of style is non-existant. But on this Ari Kagan "endorsement", Nicole is acting like Ted Ghorra when it comes to being really soft on Commies by backing the likes of a former KGB-type agent Arkady Kagan as her candidate for City Council.
Nicole is probably ignorant of the facts about Kagan. She probably doesn't know that Ari is an assumed name for the former Soviet agent Arkady Kagan, who later snooped on his neighbors back in the FSU; and who then came here: first, to betray the former Soviet refugees with family still in the FSU; then later on, to betray everybody here through his woke-lite leftwing Democrat activities; and now, as a nominal "Republican" operating with the same local Democrat Mark Treyger machine contacts, and the same woke Democrat members of his staff from when he was the Democrat Councilman.
If it weren't for a tradition of not calling their own members to testify involuntarily, Nicole Malliotakis would need to answer questions put to her by any GOP controlled congressional committee looking into foreign influences in and on our political processes. The first such question to be put to Malliotakis would be, "Are you now, or have you ever been a member of the Communist Party and/or its/ their successor organization(s), or any front organization that had engaged in common activities with and for the Communist Party, and/or its/ their successor organization(s)?"
commies!! watching All in the Family re-runs?
I cant imagine why so many unemployed consultants are so envious of Nick?
the unemployed consultants are worried nick will get that internship with nicole in 2026
Nick is in hiding.
Peter King endorsed Anna..
Post a Comment