As early as tomorrow, you can expect the House Oversight Committee to take up a not very old allegation of corruption against Joe Biden that never saw the light of day in the normal course of prosecutions against corrupt elected officials --- The gravamen of the charges should involve what a former federal prosecutor had uncovered and wanted to prosecute >>> a bribery allegation against Joe Biden and an unnamed foreign national back during 2018
You can get a preview of most of this stuff tonight on various Fox News programs
Former Assistant U.S. Attorney Bud Cummins presented his case against Biden to the U.S. Attorney for the Southern District of New York Geoff Berman back on Oct. 4, 2018, and it involved Biden's actions during his term as Vice President in the Obama administrtion.
By this evening, Fox viewers will hear that Cummins sent federal prosecutor Berman an email, in which Cummins claimed to have evidence VP Joe Biden "exercised influence to protect" his son Hunter Biden's Ukrainian "employers" in exchange for payments to both VP Joe Biden and Hunter Biden, as well as to Hunter Biden's close friend and business associate Devon Archer.
Also expect that Bud Cummins will also recount that the then-Ukraine Prosecutor General Yuriy Lutsenko had been willing to come to the America to meet with U.S. prosecutirs and give them the goods against the Bidens, father and son. In addition, there were two more "anonymous witnesses" to back up the allegations against the VP and his son.
Indicating some of what the Comer Committe hearings will be dealing with tomorrow ---U.S. Senator Chuck Grassley and House Oversight Committee Chairman James Comer wrote in a letter to Attorney General Merrick Garland and FBI Director Christopher Wraythat >>> "We have received legally protected and highly credible unclassified whistleblower disclosures. Based on those disclosures, it has come to our attention that the Department of Justice (DOJ) and the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) possess an unclassified FD-1023 form that describes an alleged criminal scheme involving then-Vice President Biden and a foreign national relating to the exchange of money for policy decisions."
9 comments:
BREAKING NEWS: THE"DONALD TRUMP CIVIL TRIAL IN NY FEDERAL COURT" EDITION
TO SOME IT MIGHT LOOK LIKE THE ROOF FELL IN ON TRUMP TODAY --- BUT NOT SO FAST.....
THE KEYSTONE OF E JEAN CARROLL'S CASE WAS THAT SHE WAS "RAPED" BY DONALD TRUMP --- THE JURY FOUND THAT NOT TO BE TRUE --- SO, EVERYTHING ELSE INDICATING GUILT IS AN INCONSISTENT VERDICT --- AND THE THAT VERDICT SHOULD BE DIMISSED BY THE TRIAL JUDGE
E Jean Carroll said she came to court "... because Trump raped me and said it didn’t happen...." The long-time sexual and other stuff advice columnist, the 79-year-old E.Jean Carroll, detailed that Trump's social media attacks against her veracity in the wake of the rape allegations that she made against Trump in her book disrupted her career and her income, [she distinguished the Trump case from what she had said about Les Moonves, a media eecutive, in her book, even though Moonvess vehemently denied the same kinds of charges, just like Trump did], but then she testified in open court that because of Trump, social media users lobbed new attacks against her, calling her a “liar, slut, ugly, old” [so] "... I couldn’t be more proud to be here..." bringing her case only against Trump.
If the jurors rejected to top charge and specification of Carroll's complaint against Donald Trump, how could those same jurors have made any findings of liability and assessed any damages against Trump ???
Make no mistake, none of the facts alleged to have been committed by Trump by E. Jean Carroll at the Bergdorf Goodman Department Store were directedly corroborated by any witness --- and E. Jean Carroll's recollection of details of that event were quite incomplete and faulty.
The Judge made rulings that were biased. Two years from now it gets overturned on appeal.
The AP reports Congressman George Santos has been indicted but the indictment has not been unsealed.
Squirrel! Squirrel!
908, regardless of what you think drives a squirrel nuts, the squirrel that you kill in jest, dies in earnest.
So say I and Henry David Thoreau.
That George Santos has made a name for himself.
George Santos is the big league version candidate with false credentials like Brian Fox and/or Gordon or Lester Chang, whichever one says he's the Brooklyn Assemblyman, who's really a fraud from Manhattan.
In the era of Ted Ghorra, the Brooklyn GOP has gotten a well-earned reputation of only running candidates with absolutely phony credentials, just like George Santos, or candidates whose arguably "genuine" credentials are really ersatz, everybody gets a trophy, affirmative action certificates of equitable social advancement or professional equivalency. Ghorra's rogues gallary of these badly bruised fruits includes: Ari Kagan, the police defunder; Vito LaBella, the police-guy-on-paper, law and order pretender (twice); Brian Fox, too many lies about himself to mention (twice); Lester Chang, the ineligible Manhattan guy, who won by his criminal acts, just like Santos; Mark Szuszkiewicz; Karim Elsammak, the boyish babe (still a virgin, technically pulled out before he ever really got in); and Vito Bruno of the police payoffs and the West Side after hours drag shows and other unseeemly tricks and happenings involving drugs and violent unhappy endings (twice); and "the beat goes on La de da de de, la de da de da."
UPDATE & BACKFILL: THE "LESTER CHANG --- UNFIT FOR OFFICE" EDITION
THIS GOP GEORGE SANTOS FRAUDS FIASCO BRINGS UP THE LOCAL LESTER CHANG FRAUDS FIASCO
THERE IS MORE EVIDENCE THAT LESTER CHANG IS COMPLETELY UNFIT TO SERVE AS A MEMBER OF THE NYS ASSEMBLY FROM THE 49TH AD --- HE IS BOOSTING AN EVENT BY THE SO-CALLED DYKER HEIGHTS CIVIC ASSOCIATION DESIGNED TO HIGHLIGHT THE PROBLEMS OF ITALIAN-AMERICAN HOMEOWNERS IN A SMALL PART OF THE ASSEMBLY DISTRICT THAT UNLAWFULLY SELECTED & ELECTED CHANG AND SENT HIM TO ALBANY
BECAUSE HE IS INELIGIBLE TO BE THE LAWFUL ASSEMBLYMEMBER REPRESENTING THE 49TH ASSEMBLY DISTRICT --- ACTUAL MANHATTANITE LESTER CHANG IS MORE THAN WILLING TO BE CONSERVATIVE PARTY "CHAIR" FRAN VELLA-MARRONE'S SOCK PUPPET AS PART OF HIS & HER SCAM TO GRIFT A NYS SALARY AND NYS FUNDS FOR AN OFFICE AND STAFF --- JUST LOOK AT THE PICTURE POSTED ALONG WITH HIS META-FACEBOOK COMMENT QUOTED BELOW.....
Here is Chang's latest post on his Meta-Facebook page:
"Lester Chang... Tonight [5-9-2023] at the Dyker Heights Civic Assoc., my team got to hear from Lt. Husic & P.O. Dieken from the 68th Precinct about the quality of life issues affecting the neighborhood & how the NYPD is working to fix them: trucks parked illegally, scooters driven recklessly & misuse of public parks...."
Clearly one of those "issues" bespeaks an anti-Asian bias..... And either Lester Chang is completely unaware that "scooters driven recklessly" has a particlar meaning relative to "Chinese delivery boys" in the Bay Ridge and Dyker Heights 68th Precinct, because he isn't really from here; or he does know something about it, and he is willing to sell-out the working class ethnic majority living in the 49th AD, but outside the 68th Pct., in order to pander to the old line Italian American hold-out home owners represented by the likes of the little clique headed by Fran Vella-Marrone and her personal posse, the Dyker Heights Civic Association.
All of this demonstrates in another context that Lester Chang is both morally and mentally challenged. His initial "confused" explanations as to his alleged Brooklyn residency, well-outside the boundaries of the 49th AD, together with his simultaneous attempt to scam the NYC Rent Stabiization Laws and maintain his Manhattan address should have been enough to dump this usurper before seating him in the Assembly. But, to see him now disserving the majority of his Asian constituents in the service of the specific interests of the "white" minority in the district takes the cannolis and leaves the egg roll.
BTW >>> Has Lester Chang properly established a legitimate residence with an address inside the 49th AD yet ??? The law does require that he do so.....
Post a Comment