THE LA TIMES CONTAINS AN ARTICLE ABOUT "FEMINISM" - "FEMINISTS" & "NOT SUPPORTING HILLARY CLINTON" BY COLLEEN SHALBY THAT MIGHT BE >>> THE BEGINNING OF THE END FOR HILLARY AND HER RUN FOR THE PRESIDENCY
IT'S MORE LIKE A SPLINTER THAN A STAKE IN THE HEART --- BUT WHO THINKS THAT A SPLINTER IN THE HEART OF THE HILLARY CAMPAIGN FOR PRESIDENT CAN'T BE FATAL TO THE EFFORT IN THE LONG RUN ???
According to Colleen Shalby, writing for the LA Times, today, "... Bernie Sanders likes to say Hillary Clinton represents the establishment — a criticism we have heard in debates and on the campaign trail.... 'Honestly, Senator Sanders is the only person who I think would characterize me, a woman running to be the first woman president, as exemplifying the establishment,' Clinton retorted. 'It’s really quite amusing to me.'... Clinton has actively fought that establishment label, using language designed to appeal to feminists. But it hasn’t worked, at least not with younger women. As Evan Halper reported, Clinton is losing the female millennial vote to Sanders. The most recent example came from the Iowa caucuses, as women ages 18 to 29 preferred Sanders.... Why?" (See "Readers React -- You can still be a feminist and vote against Hillary Clinton" by Colleen Shalby, 2/7/16, LA TIMES/ Politics [http://www.latimes.com/politics/la-pol-prez-hillary-clinton-feminism-millennial-vote-20160207-story.html]).
After going through the comments of many "feminists," who are NOT FOR HILLARY CLINTON, Colleen Shalby finishes with what seems to be HER conclusion: ".... For many, when it comes down to it, the vote for or against Clinton has nothing to do with feminism."
This is one small article, but what it says is big, Big, BIG..... If the HRC campaign continues NOT TO INSPIRE FEMINISTS, ESPECIALLY YOUNG FEMINISTS, TO VOTE FOR HER, then Hillary is toast on a stick, and even Larry "Bud" Mellman and Dave Letterman won't be able to peddle her.