There has been a lot of clap-trap and crocodile tears for Brian Fox --- BUT --- nobody is calling this what it so obviously is >>> A VERY SUSPICIOUS DEATH UNDER VERY SUSPICIOUS CIRCUMSTANCES
This bit is from Liam McCabe's Meta-FB page --- and it contains a lot of sand >>> and McCabe intends to throw some of that sand into our eyes because he has the most to hide:
"Liam McCabe... Thursday, November 9, 2023 at 6:28 PM...
...."
[[[ https://www.facebook.com/BkLiam/ ]]]
However, this Twitter (X) item is purportedly by the very same Liam Ambrose McCabe, and it is somewhat more interesting both for what it reveals, as well as for what it says and doesn't say; it appeared on Thursday, November 9, 2023
[[[https://twitter.com/ThomasHBROOLYN/status/1722703397755687077/photo/1 ]]] :
For some comparison, this is a little of the early reporting on Brian Fox's death with all of the clap-trap and crocodile tears removed:
Brian Fox wasn’t a typical politician; and what some called Brian’s near-victory in the city council race of 2021 had many thinkking that he might have had a future in Brooklyn Republican politics; however a crushing defeat in 2022 ended all of that.
The news of Brian’s passing has reverberated through the Bay Ridge community, prompting many more questions than answers about who might have been around him at the end to intervene, if possible; and what might have actually led to his death and/or been the immediate cause of it. Brian Fox’s unexpected departure serves as a poignant reminder of the fragility of life and the impact of the rather unexpected loss one individual can have on a small inner circle of collaborators each with a different detailed point of view..
Needless to say, not long before Brian Fox's death, Brian Fox was closely involved with several other well-know Bay Ridge pols, consultants and others gathering and distributing large amounts of cash; and there has not been a complete accounting for and of those funds. The fact that Brian's untimely death occurred at the very end of all that gathering and distributing is only one of the suspicious aspects of this case. Let's see if an autopsy makes things seem even more suspicious.
23 comments:
This is part of Eaton's "long term" plan
501, it's much more likely that it was part of Liam's short-term plan to have one less share for any of that big 2023 campaign cash. What do you think Liam meant when he said, ".... Just last night I spoke to Brian on the phone about his plans for the future..."; and then said the conversation ended without any resolution?
On Liam's own timeline, that had to be very shortly before Fox "died"; but Liam never did say how he knew when, where, and how "Brian Fox passed away in his sleep at home in #Bay Ridge last night...."
One thing is sure, plan or no plan, or one share more or less, Liam knows a lot more about Brian Fox's death than he has said so far.
UPDATE & BACKFILL: THE "DOG THAT BARKED TOO MUCH" EDITION
THERE ARE LOTS & LOTS & LOTS OF ERSATZ BRIAN FOX OBITUARIES ON STRANGE SITES >>> BUT THEY ALL "CIRCLE BACK" TO LIAM MC CABE AS THEIR SOLE SOURCE --- ALMOST LIKE AN OLD SOVIET ERA KGB-STYLE DISINFORMATION CAMPAIGN
--- HMMMMM !!! DIDN'T BOTH BRIAN FOX AND LIAM MC CABE HAVE RECENT INTERACTIONS WITH SOMEBODY REPUTED TO HAVE BEEN A KGB-TRAINED SOVIET INFORMATION OFFICER/ JOURNALIST OPERATIVE IN THE SOVIET ARMY ??? [[[ MAYBE WE HERE AT THIS INDEPENDENT REPUBLICAN BLOG FOR BROOKLYN AND STATEN ISLAND WILL DEVELOP THAT CONNECTION AT ANOTHER TIME.....]]] ---
The factual coverage of Fox's death in the "Home Reporter" is very sparse and Liam McCabe seems to be their only source, "... Brian Fox, a Republican who twice sought elected office in southern Brooklyn, died Nov. 8 at age 34.... The Bay Ridge resident died at home in his sleep, according to Liam McCabe...."
But judging from all the Brian Fox "obits" on a variety of sites and under the pseudonyms of a variety of authors, everything comes back to Liam McCabe's statement [posted in our main text above] as the sole source of information. But one othose did say this in addition, "Cause of Death: The specifics of Brian Fox’s cause of death have not been disclosed, reflecting a respectful distance maintained for personal and family privacy...." (See "Brian Fox Obituary What Happened To Brian Fox? How Brian Fox Died?" by Jack Reuben Fletcher, 11-10-2023, Llenelli Herald/ News [https://www.llanelliherald.com/9438/brian-fox-obituary-what-happened-to-brian-fox-how-brian-fox-died/#google_vignette]).
You're going to see lot of these thumb-shaped goons tripping over their own key bumps to speak for the dead. They're hoping it will drown out any speculation that their role in plucking this rube out of obscurity, dousing him in campaign cash only to be humiliated in two consecutive elections, might have played a contributing factor in his sudden passing.
1044, correction, that's three consecutive elections. At least for a while, Fox said he was in charge of the Kagan campaign.
Oh! Gail, and 1044, some of the contact and info drop about Fox passing at home, in his sleep, etc., was from John Seravalli.
That "How Brian Fox Died?" article was definitely written by an AI. They seem to be feeding a bot with posts tagged to Fox's Facebook page. If you look at the homepage for "The Llenelli Herald," every article is a word salad obituary for a total rando.
The part of that "... How Brian Fox Died?" article which said " "Cause of Death: The specifics of Brian Fox’s cause of death have not been disclosed, reflecting a respectful distance maintained for personal and family privacy...." couldn't have been AI feeding "a bot with posts tagged to Fox's Facebook page', because nothing like that appears on any of Fox's Facebook pages.
Also, what "family and personal privacy" interests are you talking about, 1154, that top the public's right to know details of Fox's death that are very likely the result of what some coroners would likely conclude and rule was "death by misadventure".
8:53, how does the public have a "right" to know?
1039, I am so glad you asked that, because there really are no "family and personal privacy" interests when it comes to something like the cause of somebody's death or the circumstances surrounding that peron's death. So, basically that means that the public has a right to know all the details Brian Fox's death.
Furthermore, there is really no recognized common law right of privacy in New York. Any relief for violations of any so-called privacy rights must be pursued under certain provisions of the New York State Civil Rights Law, which also limits those rights. In addition, any right of privacy is further circumscribed when there is a potential conflict with the overriding First Amendment rights of freedom of speech and a free press. The the right to privacy does not generally apply to any reports of newsworthy events. matters of public interest, or to works of artistic expression.
Lastly, there is no right of privacy of any deceased persons in New York. Again, that leads to this: in the instance of the details of and the facts surrounding the death of Brian Fox, the public does have a right to know.
Wait, there's more. There are also a variety of public information laws, federal. state, and local, that are the basic warp and woof of the public's right to know about the government's activities and government records. Among other things governmental public records include our individual vital records such as a death certificate. In New York City, if the NYPD has conducted any investigation or any act of policing, then additional rights of disclosure can accrue for the generation of various police reports, and for the disclosure of the reportss that might be generated in the course of that investigation or policing activity. There are similar rules with repect to the other NYC emergency services.
Hey 12:22, 11:54 here. I never said anything about "family and personal privacy." Why are you attributing words from that bogus article to me?
And yes, I do think the current crop of AI content generators could cobble together sentences like that, based on context cues from Facebook. The software is given parameters to compose content based on a specific structure that includes cause of death, as all the obits on that site evidently follow. So if it doesn't pick up on key phrases like "heart attack" or "cancer," it can easily fudge a text dump with meaningless platitudes about "privacy" to fill in the vague input of "died in his sleep." AI bots are great at blather.
Anyway, I don't care about Fox's privacy. He was a grifting creep elevated to the public stage by a bunch of other grifting creeps. By all means, let the world know who sold him the eightball that did him in.
Alrighty then, 113 - 1154, but I don't have anything that shows "who sold him the eightball that did him in..." or even whether it was an eightball, highball, or a low-and-away curve ball that did the poor soul in; but it sure had to be something that tortured that very young man to death the day after the election, when he also spoke about the future with his 2023 election partner.
1220: You can't even obtain a NYC death certificate, or cause-of-death report (two different things) unless you're closely related to the decedent.
1220: "There are also a variety of public information laws, federal. state, and local, that are the basic warp and woof of the public's right to know about the government's activities and government records. Among other things governmental public records include our individual vital records such as a death certificate."
Uh, death records are confidential under NYS Health Law.
https://regs.health.ny.gov/content/section-354-death-records-disclosure
657, as Gale notes, McCabe's Fox obit "appeared [on Twitter/X] on Thursday, November 9, 2023 at 2:51 PM....."
812 & 839, why do all of you Brian Fox clones and cronies lie just like he used to when he was alive?
Most of the NYS Health Law, Section 354, outlines exactly how anybody with need can obtain all the Death Certificate information they need, including "cause fof death, for a legitimate purpose. That could be anybody looking into a suspicious death of somebody that handled lots of public funds with duties to account for those funds; or where a leading member of a community that twice ran for public office, is someone whose death might have been the dirct result of scandalously bad lifestyle choices, including possibly being a fentynal death or some other "Hotshot" subtance; or where that person might have been the victim of some kind of homicide.
909, 957 here, you are so right. I got some dates and times mixed up in my first try at this.
This is what I should have written the first time: "According to his own Facebook timestamp in the Twitter (X) posting of BAY RIDGE and BEYOND @ThomasHBROOKLYN, Liam McCabe found out about Brian Fox's death by no later than 2:43 PM on 11-9-2023. However, "Queen of the Click" also dates her "RIP Brian Fox" notice as November 9, 2023 and it also contains a picture-copy of the very same Liam McCabe 11-90-2023 notice, which means that Liam probably learned of Brian Fox's death long before 2:43 PM on 11-9-2023."
1045, stop already.
You are not a lawyer -- and it really, really shows.
And if you're going to copypaste most of an entertainment lawyer's website (as you did at 1220) give him credit instead of plagiarizing.
1045 --
"how anybody with need can obtain all the Death Certificate information they need"
"That could be anybody looking into a suspicious death ..."
No, buddy, not "anybody."
"812 & 839, why do all of you Brian Fox clones and cronies lie just like he used to when he was alive?"
839 here. What clone and crony? I didn't vote for Fox or know him.
I saw him only twice -- from across the street, when he was campaigning outside of Foodtown.
OMG, 1129, sorry to spring the big reveal this way! You are a Fox clone and don't even know it.
TWIMC above, when I said "anybody", I meant ANYBODY with a demonstrable need to know, which is very broad.
Enough with the debate over some stupid certificate. Fox was 34. What did he die from?
Post a Comment