Saturday, October 22, 2016

FLASH NEWS EVENT:  THE ”TRUMP MANIFESTO FOR A NEW AMERICAN REVOLUTION” EDITION


COUCHED AS A PLAN FOR HIS FIRST 100 DAYS IN OFFICE  ---   DONALD TRUMP UNVEILS HIS PLAN FOR A NEW AMERICAN REVOLUTION  ---  PREPARED TO TAKE ON THE ENTRENCHED REPUBLICAN ESTABLISHEMENT ALONG WITH THE REST OF THE WASHINGTON,  D.C.  “SWAMP,”  THE SAME PLAN WOULD BE AN EXCELLENT PLATFORM TO MAKE THE OLD GOP INTO A NEW REPUBLICAN PARTY


TRUMP SHOWS THAT HE IS READY TO LEAD BOTH THE NATION AND THE REPUBLICAN PARTY  ---  WHETHER HE WINS THE 2016 ELECTION OR NOT 


According to the  Newsmax report on Donald Trump’s Gettysburg speech  ---  GOP nominee Donald Trump Saturday outlined an ambitious plan for his first 100 days in office, saying on the first day alone he has several steps he plans to take to end Washington's corruption….  ‘One thing we all know is that we will never solve our problems by relying on the same politicians who created these problems in the first place,’ Trump said to a supportive, cheering audience in historic Gettysburg, Pennsylvania.  ‘Hillary Clinton is not running against me, she's running against change. And she's running against all of the American people and all of the American voters.’…  It's time to for Americans to ‘dream big’ once again, said Trump, outlining in what he called a ‘contract between Donald J. Trump and the American voter,’  that begins with  ‘bringing honesty, accountability and change to Washington, D.C.’…  The first six measures, Trump said, will be  ‘immediately’  pursued on his first day of his first term in office to  ‘clean up the corruption and special interests collusion in Washington.’   "   (See “The first six measures, Trump said, will be "immediately" pursued on his first day of his first term in office to "clean up the corruption and special interests collusion in Washington"  by Sandy Fitzgerald, 10/22/16,  Newsmax/ Breaking News [http://www.newsmax.com/Newsfront/Trump-Plan-First-Days/2016/10/22/id/754831/]).

Finally Newsmax noted that  ---  “Trump outlined his plans after opening the speech by railing against what he calls a ‘rigged’ election system, and by demanding how rival Hillary Clinton should be allowed to run for office, given her activities in connection with her use of a secret email server while secretary of State.”

A NEW AMERICAN REVOLUTION & A NEW REPUBLICAN PARTY 

That is a much too narrow view of what Donald Trump’s Gettysburg speech was all about.   It doesn’t take a lot of imagination to see that Donald Trump is throwing down against the entrenched establishment  ---  both in the short run and long term.

Taking the longer view,  one can easily perceive today’s speech  as Donald Trump’s  MANIFESTO  for a SECOND AMERICAN REVOLUTION,  whether or not he wins on election day.   Part of that revolution would be Trump’s take-over of the Republican Party and  a complete purge of all establishment types from the GOP leadership, who would be expected to resist Trump’s reforms.

28 comments:

Anonymous said...

More hot air from a con man with no morals or self-control.

Anonymous said...

What are you talking about? Trump seemed very controlled, thoughtful and empathetic.

Anonymous said...

I get it.

Manifesto is a word that carries a sarcastic tone it. I sense you are not a true Trump man.

Galewyn Massey said...

RESPONSE: THE "NO, YOU DO NOT '...GET IT' " EDITION

TO: "ANONYMOUS SAID... AT 8:36 PM"

You need to closely differentiate "ironic" from "sarcastic"; then you will be able to understand what I am saying when I put this to you --- MY MAIN POST ABOVE IS NOT EITHER IRONIC OR SARCASTIC, NOR SLY OR INSINCERE.

Anonymous said...

Now I get it.

You are a contrarian, not to be confused with being Armenian or vegetarian. What I said was I suspected you are not a true Trump man.

Anonymous said...

ass**** above sounds like he is reading from fortune cookies.

Galewyn Massey said...

RESPONSE: THE "NOW, IT IS >>> I <<< THAT 'GETS IT' " EDITION

TO: "ANONYMOUS SAID... AT 11:36 PM"

You sly devil, you !!!

I missed your obviously Marco Rubio-like jibe, when you said that you suspected I was "...not a true Trump man."

Maybe, you should know that Galewyn Massey's hands are even bigger than the Donald's are.

PS --- I suspect that you drive one of those big pickup trucks that you have to climb up to get into. You know what they say about people of a certain age --- "If they have to drive a big truck, they must be trying to make up for a baby-sized....."

Anonymous said...

The una bomber issued manifestos

Anonymous said...

At least one of the Unibomber's surviving victims is supporting Donald Trump.

Galewyn Massey said...

FLASH UPDATE & SOME BACKFILL: THE “SOME OF THE MECHANICS OF RIGGING THE POLLS IN FAVOR OF HILLARY CLINTON” EDITION

TODAY’S ABC/WA-PO POLL IS SHOWN TO "HEAVILY OVERSAMPLE" DEMOCRATS OVER REPUBLICANS IN ORDER TO GET TO HRC'S SUPPOSED "DOUBLE-DIGIT" LEAD OVER TRUMP --- POSSIBLY MORE RIGGING THAN THAT MIGHT HAVE BEEN INVOLVED

AT LEAST ONE WIKILEAKED PODESTA E-MAIL DISCUSSED HOW TO MAXIMIZE THE EFFECT OF “MEDIA … POLLING” BY URGING SPECIFIC CATEGORIES OF “OVERSAMPLING” & AVOIDANCE OF SPECIFIC OTHER CATEGORIES OF OVESAMPLING

NO DETAILS OF POSSIBLESPECIFIC ETHNIC OVERSAMPLING ARE EVER PROVIDED IN THE POLLSTERS’ PRESS KITS OR BACKGROUND DATA


In the wake of today’s breathtaking ABC/Washington Post poll showing Democrat Hillary Clinton now well ahead of Republican Donald Trump, many Republicans and other Trump supporters might have been looking for some solace..... Well, here is something that you might want to hang your hat on, allow you to sit down and take a deep cleansing breath, and be ready to see and explain just how the HRC Campaign, many of the “scientific” pollsters and a complicit media are working to leverage this 2016 election through the pre-election “media polling” that is skewed by something called "oversampling."

Republicans and other Donald Trump supporters need to see a couple of recent WONKY articles that are in a statistics oriented investor internet magazine called “The Zero Hedge” (See “This Is How WaPo’s Latest Poll Gave Hillary a Twelve Point Advantge over Trump” by Tyler Durden, 10/23/16, The Zero Hedge [Internet Magazine] [http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2016-10-23/how-wapos-latest-poll-give-hillary-12-point-advantage-over-trump]; and “New Podesta Email Exposes Dem Playbook for Rigging Polls by ‘Oversamples’” by Tyler Durden, 10/23/16, The Zero Hedge [Internet magazine] [http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2016-10-23/new-podesta-email-exposes-dem-playbook-rigging-polls-through]).

The first article in "Zero Hedge" cited above, largely discredits the ABC/WaPo poll by focusing on many of the shortcomings in it. It also noted that the ABC/WaPo poll was embargoed until 9:00 AM Sunday so that it would be a bigger news item on all of the Sunday talk shows and cable news broadcasts.

The latter "Zero Hedge" article by Tyler Durden focuses on a recently released Email of John Podesta’s that was very specific in its instruction how to jigger and skew the “media polling” so as to benefit the HRC Campaign. Some of the instructions were actually tailored to specific target states --- with instructions on whom to poll and exactly where to poll specific subgroups like “self-identified independents” so that they would be more favorable to Hillary Clinton. As for “national polling” the oversampling might include specific “key districts” and targeted ethnic oversamples. All of it with the caveat “…as needed…” Another warning by Podesta was that all polls should specifically not over-samplel older Americans.

Anonymous said...

Today, Trump said that the polls a rigged and that the mainstream media won't report that he is winning. Most of the left wing MSM have reported this as somewhere between hype and lunacy. At the same time the right wing media are split, some reporting as if these speeches are factual and some of them, associated with the establishment GOP or Neo-Cons, sort of lining up with their MSM colleagues.

Nobody is looking into the real issues in all of this: How are the polls being conducted? What does the sample look like? And, how easy is it to gimmick the results.

Of course, why would the media do anything to debunk the "media polls"?

Also today, at least three good solid polls have Trump either even or slightly ahead of Hillary Clinton.

Anonymous said...

There are no good, solid polls that show Trump winning.

Galewyn Massey said...

RESPONSE: THE "UPS AND DOWNS" EDITION

TO: "ANONYMOUS SAID... AT 7:21 AM"

At the time I posted my prior comment above, Trump led two polls by one (1) point and was tied in another..... Those polls, Rasmussen, IBD, and LA Times/USC now have Trump tied or behind by a point.

Meanwhile, several of the "media polls" are tightening with HRC's nationwide lead dropping from around 7% to around 5%, including the averaging poll of polls.

BTW --- the current weakness of Trump's campaign is the complete internal failure of the Republican Party to maintain party discipline --- too many Republicans are more loyal to the DC establishment than conservative GOP principles. If Trump can move the votes of half of the Republicans now saying they are against him, he would move ahead of Hillary.

Anonymous said...

Today North Carolina has Clinton leading by 7%.

Its over

Galewyn Massey said...

RESPONSE: THE "GET REAL IN YOUR OWN HEAD" EDITION

YOU HAVE TO KNOW WHEN SOMETHING IS OBVIOUSLY WRONG.....

START WITH THE NEW YORK TIMES SAID IT.....

The Times has become the New Pravda, but without the subtlety. Seven points (7%) North Carolina --- seriously ? I mean SERIOUSLY !!!

In less than a day it goes from CBS saying NC was a virtual tie to the Times/Sienna folks saying it's a near-landslide blowout.....

Give me a break !!!

Look at the material above about "over-sampling" in the polling.

Anonymous said...

The New York Times isnt even trying to make it look good. The story of FBI agents spouse running for congress that got 675 thousand dollars should be Chris Matthews lead story. But I guess Chris Matthews wife also got a piece of that action.

Galewyn Massey said...

RESPONSE: THE "TO MAKE IT EVEN CLEARER" EDITION

FIRST, IT'S NOT JUST ANY OLD FBI AGENT'S WIFE --- DR. JILL MC CABE WAS FBI AGENT ANDREW MC CABE'S WIFE --- ANDREW MC CABE WAS INVOLVED IN THE HILLARY CLINTON E-MAILS INVETIGATION, SUDDENLY ROSE INSIDE THE FBI AND IS NOW FBI DEPUTY DIRECTOR

THIS WHOLE MC AULIFFE DONATION TO JILL MC CABE >>> WITH HER FBI AGENT HUSBAND HAVING A POSITION IN THE HILLARY CLINTON E-MAILS INVESTIGATION >>> AND THEN HAVING AGENT MC CABE RISE TO A SUPERVISING ROLE IN THE E-MAILS INVESTIGATION AND THEN NEAR THE TOP OF THE FBI ADMINISTRATION STINKS TO HIGH HEAVEN

Here's how and when it all went down [note some accounts in the MSM dispute certain details of this >>> timeline <<< only]:
• In March 2015, news broke about Hillary Clinton’s private server that was used to send and receive classified E-mails --- also later that month, Dr. Jill McCabe announced her candidacy for a seat in the Virginia State Senate 9some say she was directly recruited by Gov. Terry McAuliffe);
• In July 2015, the FBI commenced its investigation into Clinton’s private server E-mails --- at that time FBI Agent Andrew McCabe, who was running the FBI’s Washington, DC office, had a part in the probe and was quickly promoted to the No. 3 position at FBI headquarters and joined the new team overseeing the Clinton investigation;
• In September 2015, McAuliffe accounted for large donations to Dr. McCabe's campaign;
• In February 2016, Mr. McCabe was promoted to the level of FBI Deputy Director, becoming FBI Director James Comey’s second-in-command; and
• July 2016, the FBI announced decision to not press charges against Hillary Clinton.

Dick Black, the Virginia State Senator who defeated Jill McCabe in 2015 has long said he still doesn’t know exactly why the governor and others specifically recruited Dr. McCabe to run against him; however, Black, formerly a high-ranking government prosecutor at the Pentagon, and now a Trump supporter, said he’s certain that FBI Agent Andrew McCabe shouldn’t have been aloud anywhere near to the investigation into Hillary Clinton's E-mails and server after FBI Agent McCabe's wife’s campaign received such a large boost from McAuliffe personally.

It should be noted that --- McAuliffe has longstanding ties with Hillary Clinton as well as her husband. Governor McAuliffe led the effort to raise the money for Bill Clinton’s 1996 re-election bid, vacationed with both of the Clintons after the Monica Lewinsky scandal, and after the Clintons left the White House, and were being swamped by legal fees and other debts, McAuliffe secured a $1.35 million mortgage to allow them to purchase their house in Chappaqua, New York. And this: Terry McAuliffe also helped HRC finance her 2008 presidential bid.

In a formal statement, the FBI has stated that its agent, Andrew McCabe, sought guidance from the FBI's ethics officers; and that the agent did recuse himself of “all FBI investigative matters involving Virginia politics” >>>> throughout his wife’s campaign <<< as if that fact exhausted all of the possible ethical considerations.

Anonymous said...

Is Megyn Kelly on the Clinton payroll?

Her entire show looks like an MSNBC episode with blondes

Galewyn Massey said...

RESPONSE & UPDATE: THE "CALLING HER OUT ON-AIR FOR FEELING HER OATS" EDITION

MEGYN KELLY IS AGAIN BIG NEWS IN THE PRESIDENTIAL RACE --- THIS TIME IN A VIDEO THROW-DOWN WITH TRUMP SURROGATE NEWT GINGRICH

SINCE WE ALL NOW KNOW THAT MOST OF THE BIG-TIME MEDIA FOLKS ARE PART OF HILLARY CLINTON'S VANGUARD --- WE CAN NOW SAFELY SAY THAT MEGYN KELLY IS SOLIDLY IN THAT CLUB

THE NEWT GINGRICH INTERVIEW WITH MEGYN HAS BEEN FEATURED IN THE WASHINGTON POST --- ACTUALLY THE WA-PO'S REPORT IS QUITE BALANCED

Late last night, in a regular Wa-Po column ironically called "The Fix," the Wa-Po's Rebecca Sinderbrand posted an article that captured one of the key reasons that Donald Trump is behind Hillary Clinton instead of comfortably ahead in this 2016 race. The piece highlighted one of the epi-phenominal moments of the 2016 presidential campaign --- a snapshot that typifies one of the intrinsic realities of the 2016 campaign --- Megyn Kelly's emergence as a MEDIA STAR, much of it due to her often-expressed disdain for Donald Trump. In this instant, it was all about Newt Gingrich's calling-out Megyn Kelly for how she was doing it (See "‘You are fascinated with sex’: That Megyn Kelly-Newt Gingrich showdown was one for the ages" by Rececca Sinderbrand, 10/25/16, The Washington Post/ The Fix [https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/the-fix/wp/2016/10/25/you-are-fascinated-with-sex-that-megyn-kelly-newt-gingrich-showdown-was-one-for-the-ages/]).

Here's how the Wa-Po article started: "There are times when words do not do complete justice to a moment. Tuesday night’s Newt Gingrich-Megyn Kelly showdown is one of those times, which is why we’ve included the clip above of its final moments.... Gingrich, on Fox in his role as a Donald Trump surrogate, had questioned the stories of women who’ve come forward to accuse Trump of sexual assault — and the relative importance of the controversy itself, relative to Hillary Clinton’s alleged misdeeds.... Kelly pushed back. 'As a media story, we don’t get to say that 10 women are lying. We have to cover that story, sir,' said the Fox anchor.... 'Sure. Okay,' Gingrich said. 'So, so it’s worth 23 minutes of the three networks to cover that story, and Hillary Clinton had a secret speech in Brazil to a bank that pays her 225,000 [dollars], saying her dream is an open border where 600 million people could come to America — that’s not worth covering …'... ” That snippet gives you a little of the flavor; the whole article is better; and the Fox tape is best of all.

It ends with Megyn talking to Newt about Newt's dealing with his "Anger issues..." and Newt's final words, "...and you too, Megyn."

Anonymous said...

Trump TV

Get used to it

Galewyn Massey said...

FOLLOW-UP UPDATE: THE "TRUMP WON'T BE UPSTAGED" EDITION

TRUMP QUICKLY CONGRATUALATED NEWT GINGRICH FOR PUTTING FOX'S NEWS-TALK HOST MEGYN KELLY IN HER PLACE --- TRUMP ADDED >>> ".... WE DON'T PLAY GAMES, NEWT." <<< AS THE OFFICIAL DONALD J. TRUMP IMPRIMATUR


Here's the take-away as told by the AP: "Donald Trump praised Newt Gingrich Wednesday for an 'amazing interview' with Fox News Channel host Megyn Kelly, in which the former speaker told Kelly that she is 'fascinated with sex.'... The heated exchange on Kelly's program Tuesday night ended with her suggesting Gingrich take some time for anger management [BTW, NO IT DIDN'T -- it ended with Newt Gingrich's line: "....And you too, Megyn."]... The riveting confrontation revived dormant ill will with the Trump campaign toward Kelly that dates to his anger at her asking him at a pre-Republican primary debate more than a year ago to account for statements about women. Trump boycotted a later GOP debate when Fox wouldn't remove Kelly as a moderator.... Gingrich attended Trump's dedication of his new hotel in Washington on Wednesday, and the candidate recognized him in the audience.... 'Congratulations,' Trump said. 'That was an amazing interview last night ... We don't play games, Newt.'..." (See "Trump praises Gingrich for criticism of Kelly " by David Bauder, AP "TV Writer", 10.26/16, Associated Press/MSN Feed [http://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/trump-praises-gingrich-for-criticism-of-kelly/ar-AAjqZ1K?li=BBmkt5R&ocid=spartandhp]).

Anonymous said...

Gingrich was attacking the media and the "three networks" -- and Megyn Kelly was defending herself and Fox.
Megyn Kelly should have thrown in the towel when she clearly said to Newt Gingrich and her audience, "I am not obsessed with sex." That was a Trump-like emotional response that is typical for her when she has any kind of feisty guest, right, left or center. It was emotional and completely unprofessional, both as a newsperson and as a lawyer.
In this instance it was Newt Gingrich standing in for the Trump side. It was point, game, set and match for Newt Gingrich, who was the clear winner to Megyn Kelly's Fox viewers.

Anonymous said...

It was "fascinated" not "obsessed," just sayin'.

Anonymous said...

Trump may win Florida, Iowa, Ohio but he is losing bad in Virginia, PA, NH.

he loses

Galewyn Massey said...

UPDATE: THE "GETTING TIGHTER" EDITION

BOTH IN NATIONAL POLLING AND IN THE BATTLEGROUND STATES, HILLARY IS STILL MOSTLY AHEAD BUT BY SMALLER & SMALLER MARGINS

TRUMP DOING BETTER IN OHIO AND FLORIDA --- SEVERAL STATES MOVED FROM LEANING DEMOCRAT TO TOSS-UP

Both the polling averages and several of the individual state polls show that the Clinton-Trump election is looking closer than the MSM has been leading everybody to think. Today, even the Clinton campaign expressed a note of warning by telling its people --- we are still "ahead" but Trump can still win it on election day if we let up.

Galewyn Massey said...

FOLLOW-UP UPDATE: THE "OR AS MSNBC PUTS IT" EDITION

ON LATEST POLLING: "POSSIBILITY OF A TRUMP PRESIDENCY REMAINS REAL"
--- MSNBC


According to a print article by MSNBC --- ".... In other words, the more [the] race 'tightens,' the more it reminds the American electorate that this thing isn't over, and the possibility of a Trump presidency remains real." (See "Latest polls offer mixed results for Clinton, Trump" by Steve Benen, 10/27/16, MSNBC/ MSN Feed [http://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/latest-polls-offer-mixed-results-for-clinton-trump/ar-AAjte6l?li=BBmkt5R&ocid=spartandhp]).

Anonymous said...

12 more days and Trump goes down as a big fat loser

Anonymous said...

you mean Hillary goes down as big fat winner