Speaking at the White House this past Wednesday, the President of the United States falsely stated that >>> "The Second Amendment, from the day it was passed, limited the type of people who could own a gun and what type of weapon you could own. You couldn’t buy a cannon...."
While mocking the Second Amendment with a patently false history of the rights it protects, President Joseph Biden went on to say that people who supported the right to bear arms would need nuclear weapons and advanced jet fighter planes in order to take on the United States government
Here are the most offensive, provocative --- and yes threatening --- quotes made by a POTUS in a very, very long time:
".... The Second Amendment, from the day it was passed, limited the type of people who could own a gun and what type of weapon you could own. You couldn’t buy a canon.... Those who say the 'blood of patriots,' you know, and all the stuff about how we’re gonna have to move against the government. Well, the tree of liberty has not been watered with the blood of patriots.... What’s happened is that there have never been, if you want to, think you need to have weapons to take on the government, you need F-15s and maybe some nuclear weapons.... The point is that there has always been the ability to limit — rationally limit the type of weapon that can be owned and who can own it.... We're not changing the Constitution. We're enforcing it...." And it was good old nice guy President Joe Biden that said all that stuff....
NOW, I PUT IT TO YOU --- WHY DID PRESIDENT BIDEN MAKE SUCH REMARKS AT THIS TIME IN OUR HISTORY ?????
16 comments:
Biden made the remarks because he is senile. Now go turn on the record player.
Private citizens and corporations have owned, manufactured and distributed fully operating cannon throughout the history of the United States, and they still do. They have also done the same with machine guns, heavy automatic weapons, armored vehicles, jet fighter aircraft and other experimental munitions and weaponry, including the largest cannon ever built.
Joe Biden doesn't know the basics of guerilla and other asymmetric kinds of warfare. The U.S. had all the best jets and other weaponry in Vietnam, Iraq and Afghanistan; and, as a practical matter, it lost all those wars anyway --- certainly, the U.S. didn't win any of them.
So far 2 lawyers that said "trial by comb**" are now both ex-lawyers.
I don't go to CNN for Brian Fox coverage.
I don't go to GOP Fountainhead for Joe Biden news
RESPONSE: THE "ALWAYS GO TO THE SOURCE THAT TELLS IT TO YOU STRAIGHT" EDITION
TO: "ANONYMOUS SAID... AT 8:04 PM" & "... AT 10:31 PM"
I HOPE THAT YOU AREN'T REFERRING TO RUDY GIULIANI IN YOUR REMARKS --- HE IS VERY FAR FROM BEING AN EX-ATTORNEY.....
AS FOR CNN"S REPORTING ON BRIAN FOX, I AGREE WITH THEIR EDITORIAL DECISION NOT TO COVER HIM --- ON THE OTHER HAND, HOW CNN CAN GIVE ANY PRESIDENT A PASS FOR CLEARLY SUGGESTING THAT ANY ARMED INSURRECTION IN THE U.S. WOULD NECESSARILY INVOLVE THE USE OF ADVANCED JET AIRCRAFT AND/OR NUCLEAR WEAPONS, WHILE HE PRESUMABLY HAS THE SOLE CONTROL OF SUCH INSTRUMENTALITIES ??? THIS IS CLEARLY JOURNALISTIC MALPRACTICE BY CNN --- AS WELL AS THE OTHER MSM OUTLETS THAT FAILED TO MENTION IT.....
Some people are trying to treat these presidential remarks as just another of Biden's Brain Farts --- however, they are not, he's expressed very similar thoughts in the past, but this time he's upped the ante with the mention of jets and nukes.
Rudy is an ex-lawyer. Suspended indefinitely.
RESPONSE: THE "YOU ARE IGNORANT" EDITION
TO: "ANONYMOUS SAID... AT 8:27 AM"
WITHOUT A DOUBT, YOU ARE INSUFFERABLY IGNORANT; HOWEVER, IT IS NOT CLEAR WEATHER YOU ARE INVINCIBLY IGNORANT OR VINCIBLY IGNORANT --- YOUR ULTIMATE CULPABLITY AND PUNISHMENT RIDES ON THE OUTCOME OF THAT QUESTION.....
THIS "INDEFINITE SUSPENSION" IS BY ITS NATURE "TEMPORARY" AND IT WILL NOT HOLD UP LEGALLY NOR STAND THE TEST OF TIME.....
People like you are looking through the wrong end of the telescope at "Rudy" --- As a lawyer, Rudolph William Louis Giuliani is not a threat to the nation, except insofar as he is a doddering old fool and a threat to the reputations of himself, friendly interviewers, and Donald Trump and the Trump movement.
BTW, one of Rudy's lawyers in this case was a pretty close political associate of mine in the day and he is very unimpressed with the quality of the court's decision and its legal underpinnings.
UPDATE & BACKFILL: THE "BRIAN FOX REPORTING" EDITION
MY BEST SOURCE FOR NEGATIVE INFORMATION ABOUT THE BRIAN FOX FOR CITY COUNCIL CAMPAIGN, IS THE BRAIN FOX FOR CITY COUNCIL SOCIAL MEDIA PAGES --- THIS FRESH FROM THE FACEBOOK SITE:
MORE BAD VISUALS --- THIS TIME IT'S BRIAN FOX >>>AND<<< CURTIS SLIWA ON FIFTH AVENUE BEING IGNORED BY THE GOOD PEOPLE OF BAY RIDGE --- LET'S SEE HOW LONG THE FOX FOLKS KEEP THIS UP BEFORE THEY FIGURE IT OUT
Clearly, Fox and friends are continuing to follow the best practices of the Mateo primary effort.....
FOR THE RECORD: THE "YAHOO! NEWS" EDITION
THIS WAS HOW "YAHOO! NEWS" DESCRIBED ITS PRESENTATION OF A BBC NEWS VIDEO OF JOE BIDEN'S REMARKS ABOUT JET FIGHTERS AND NUCLEAR WEAPONS, AND INSURRECTIONISTS EARLIER THIS WEEK:
"Biden: 'You need F-15s and nukes' to fight government... Wed, June 23, 2021, 7:38 PM... President Joe Biden says at the White House that insurrectionists would need a lot more than guns to take on a US government equipped with a nuclear arsenal and war planes. Critics said Mr Biden's remark undercuts claims by his fellow Democrats that America almost lost its democracy in January's Capitol riot by mostly unarmed Trump supporters...." (See "Biden: 'You need F-15s and nukes' to fight government" Yahoo News/BBC News Staff, 6/23/2021. Yahoo! News/ BBC News [https://news.yahoo.com/biden-f-15s-nukes-fight-233843549.html]).
Vito F is the next SI BP
Not so fast! There's more to come in the primary contest with Matteo.
Curtis beat Matteo 2 to 1
1247
What more? He lost by an even larger margin?
Matteo conceded to Curtis on primary night.
UPDATE & BACKFILL: THE "KIND OF JUDGES WE HAVE HERE IN NEW YORK" EDITION
THOSE THAT THINK THAT AN "ELECTION CASE" WILL PERMANENTLY GET RUDY GIULIANI "DISBARRED," BECAUSE A FEW NYS JUDGES MADE A DECISION --- WILL NEED TO READ THE LATEST IN THE ONGOING SAGA OF JOHN KENNEDY O'HARA --- A >>> FORMERLY DISBARRED ATTORNEY <<< WHO IS COMING BACK WITH A VENGEANCE..... [OVER THE YEARS MANY NYS JUDGES WERE INVOLVED IN THE O'HARA CASE(S) --- AND THEY HANDED DOWN MANY DECISIONS AGAINST THE THEN-YOUNG MAN]
IN A FRONT PAGE ARTICLE IN THE "ALBANY TIMES-UNION" BY WENDY LIBERATORE >>> AN UPSTATE JUDGE IS ACCUSED OF GIVING AN "... 'INCOMPLETE OR INCORRECT INTERPRETATION OF EVIDENCE' [IN A] CASE THAT INVOLVED A BOARD OF ELECTIONS' PROSECUTION OF A BROOKLYN ACTIVIST IN THE 1990[S]..." --- ALL THAT QUOTED MATERIAL IS FROM AN INTERNAL REPORT FROM THE BROOKLYN DA'S OFFICE ON THE O'HARA CASE[S], WHICH DA'S OFFICE HAD PROSECUTED MR. O'HARA AFTER A REFERRAL FROM THE BOARD OF ELECTIONS, IN WHICH AN ALBANY-AREA SPECIAL COUNSEL TO THE BOARD OF ELECTIONS, NAMED "WAIT," HAD A HEAVY HAND.
Needless to say, the Albany Times-Union article focused on an Albany-based player named Jeffrey Wait, who is now an Albany-area judge. My sources indicated that some NYC dailies are looking into this report by the Office of the Kings County District Attorney, and they are focusing on several local players in Brooklyn: some, once in the DA's Office of Charles Hynes; others, active in Democrat machine politics in the 1990s in Windsor Terrace, Kensington, Park Slope, and Sunset Park. Those pols not only worked directly with the Board of Elections and the prosecutors, which is reflected in the Brooklyn DA's report; they communicated directly with many of the judges that were handling the case at its various stages.
After all these years, this case is suddenly growing faster than "Topsy".....
Post a Comment