Why is it OK to prosecute an iconic black man from the 70s, 80s and 90s, like Bill Cosby, for rape and sexual abuse years after the fact — BUT — it’s not OK to bring up the exact same kind of stuff about Bill Clinton ???
“Having dodged this bullet before and because no Democrat raised this issue when she ran in 2000 Hillary must have figured the MSM would cut off discussion of Bill’s record of sexual assault and rape … and Hillary’s role in silencing his victims....” — HOWEVER IT’S NOW 2016 — “... Bill Clinton, like Bill Cosby is a sexual predator....” — AND — “.... Hillary is an accessory after the fact in all of Clinton’s sex crimes...” — Roger Stone [Daily Caller, 1/4/16]
According to an opinion piece in the Daily Caller, Roger Stone, a former senior advisor to Donald Trump, said this: “.... It is obvious the Clinton-enabling [main stream media] wants to substitute ‘marital infidelity’ and ‘consensual blow jobs’ for serial rape, serial sexual assault and Hillary’s criminal terror campaigns to silence Bills victims . This isn’t about infidelity or consensual sex. It’s not about adultery or ‘pain in the Clinton marriage.’ It’s not about Bill’s girlfriends, mistresses or one-night stands. It’s about something far darker...” (See “The Clintons’ Cosby Meltdown” by Roger Stone, 1/4/2016, The Daily Caller/ Opinion [http://dailycaller.com/2016/01/04/the-clintons-cosby-meltdown/]). Stone went on to say that “... Bill Clinton, like Bill Cosby is a sexual predator....”
Roger Stone thinks that Donald Trump completely upset the Clinton Campaign narrative last week. According to Stone’s view, Bill and Hillary Clinton both systematically abused women in in their past scramble for power and wealth. The couple’s acts included abusive behavior that was sexual, physical and psychological, and Donald Trump knows all about it.
Roger Stone pulls no punches when it comes to Bill Clinton’s sexual excesses — “.... Bill [Clinton] has attacked, over-powered, bit, raped or exposed himself while in a state of arousal to Eileen Wellstone, Juanita Broaddrick, Carolyn Moffet, Liz Ward Gracen, Becky Brown, Helen Dowdy, Paula Jones, Kathy Fergusen, Christy Zercher and Kathleen Willey, among dozens of others....”
WHAT IT’S ALL ABOUT
Here’s how Roger Stone sees the evolving debate between HRC and Donald Trump: “Hillary Clinton is running for president as an ‘advocate of women and girls,’ but the hypocritical way she treated women in her personal quest for power could only be described as waging a war on women. Trump gets it....” and “.... Hillary has already bungled the issue....”BILL & HILLARY CLINTON, AND A PARTICULAR BILL COSBY INCIDENT
Roger Stone says that the flair up of the civil cases and the persecution of Bill Cosby could not have come at a worse time for the Hillary Clinton Campaign. Our prospective future First Husband, Bill Clinton, has been widely accused of being a sexual predator, just like by the multitude of women going after Cosby. Although he there’s been no allegation that the former president might have drugged his victims, Bill did a lot of coke according to ex-girlfriends and at least four Arkansas State Troopers.Stone also specifically pointed out that Bill Cosby actually headlined a campaign event for Hillary Clinton when she was running to become the Senator from New York in 2000. And that according to a local Democrat lawyer who volunteered to work for Clinton’s advance team on an election eve event in Buffalo, a Clinton campaign volunteer assigned to drive Cosby said that he tried to grope her.
HERE’S HOW ROGER STONE SUMS IT ALL UP
“.... Hillary Clinton is running for president as an ‘advocate of women and girls.’ She announced Bill was going to campaign for her. The hypocritical way she treated women in her personal quest for power could only be described as waging a war on women, a war voters will know about.”It sort of sounds like Roger and Donald really want to go after this stuff in a big way.
8 comments:
Stone is the evil genius
Yes I would agree Stone is a genius but is he Trumps genius?
BTW: Is Trump on the ballot in NY?
Gail, if you go to the link for Daily Caller, you'll see that Roger Stone is hawking a book. Why didn't you mention that.
Yeah Gail why didnt you mention that?
UPDATE: THE "ECHO CHAMBER HAS PICKED UP THE STORY" EDITION
ON TODAY'S JAKE TAPPER PROGRAM ON CNN >>> TAPPER DID A SEGMENT ABOUT HILLARY'S AND BILL'S SUDDENLY BEING CONFRONTED IN THE 2016 CAMPAIGN BY NEW VERSIONS OF THE OLD CHARGES ABOUT BILL CLINTON'S SEXUAL ABUSE OF WOMEN
EARLY IN THE TAPPER REPORT WAS A PROMINENT MENTION THAT JUANITA BRODERICK HAS RENEWED HER LONG-HELD CLAIM THAT SHE WAS RAPED BY ARKANSAS AG BILL CLINTON IN 1978 WHILE WORKING ON HIS CAMPAIGN FOR GOVERNOR
Tapper's segment noted that neither Bill Clinton nor Hillary have directly responded to these charges in 2016 when they have been confronted along the campaign trail or when they have been mentioned by Donald Trump.
Panelist Donna Brazile appeared to speak favorably for both WJC & HRC -- however, she largely evaded all of the substantive issues raised by Tapper with collateral attacks on Trumps general positions, that Trump is a misogynist and a pat answer that Hillary remains a strong voice for women and girls.
Bill Kristol was the "Republican" voice on the panel, but immediately stated that he would be happy to bash both Hillary Clinton and Donald Trump..... Nonetheless, Kristol listed three separate instances of Hillary Clinton's supporting Bill Clinton's lies about his varied sexual improprieties with other women by sliming the three women involved.
Bill Clinton was disbarred because of a lie about sex.
End of story.
FURTHER UPDATE: THE "OTHER CABLE NEWS NETWORKS GET IN ON THE ACT" EDITION
BOTH FOX NEWS AND MSNBC DO FEATURES SIMILAR TO TAPPER'S ON CNN -- MENTIONING JUANITA BROADDRICK* AND ALL THE REST
ALSO TRUMP AIRS VIDEO AD LINKING HILLARY TO THE TWO BILLS, CLINTON & COSBY, ALONG WITH MONICA LEWINSKY & ANTHONY WEINER
Almost every Fox News host has found a reason to run the Trump video ad last night [1/7/16] during their respective programs.....
______________________________
* PLEASE NOTE: CORRECT SPELLING IS "JUANITA BROADDRICK" NOT "JUANITA BRODERICK" AS POSTED IN MY >>> January 7, 2016 at 2:59 PM <<< COMMENT ABOVE
UPDATE: THE "ONE-TWO PUNCH" EDITION
IN ADDITION TO TRUMP'S EARLY PLAY OF THE BILL CLINTON SEX ABUSE CARD, THE STATE DEPARTMENT'S LATEST DOCUMENT DROP OF HILLARY'S E-MAILS SHOWS THAT HILLARY'S E-MAIL SCANDAL IS STILL BREWING AND IT IS A VERY BIG DEAL
ANOTHER PROVERBIAL "SMOKING GUN" IS CONTAINED IN ONE OF HILLARY'S E-MAILS TO A TOP AIDE -- IN THIS ONE, HRC GAVE INSTRUCTIONS TO TAKE OUT HEADER INFORMATION THAT WOULD INCICATE THE DOCUMENT'S CLASSIFIED STATUS AND THEN SEND IT TO HER NON-SECURE E-MAIL ON HER "PRIVATE" SERVER
THAT SINGLE E-MAIL IS A DOUBLE-WHAMMY --- IT MIGHT BE EVIDENCE OF A CRIMINAL ACT IN AND OF ITSELF, AND IT DEMONSTRATES HILLARY CLINTON'S OVERALL STATE OF MINE ABOUT THE HANDLING OF CLASSIFIED MATERIAL ON HER PRIVATE NON-SECURE SYSTEM
With the latest turnover of Hillary Clinton E-mails by the U.S. State Department, it's been disclosed that the total of "CLASSIFIED" E-mails that were among HRC's official correspondence has exceeded 1300 (>>> REMEMBER HILLARY ORIGIANLLY SAID THERE WERE NONE [0]), with one of those added to the "SECRET" category.
When it became obvious that the public was learning that Hillary's private non-secure E-mail system did contain many classified items, HRC and her team came up with the fallback line that none of the items on her E-mail were "MARKED CLASSIFIED" at the time Secretary Clinton received and/or sent them. Some very significant background information for all of that was contained in the most recent Clinton E-mail drop by the U.S. State Department --- that was in the form of an E-mail to a senior advisor giving specific instructions to strip out header information indicating the classified nature of the document.
Legal experts specializing in cases involving the handling of classified material have indicated two things about that E-mail: 1) giving those specific instructions might be a crime (given the nature of the document being discussed in the Clinton E-mail); and 2) the instructions given indicate HRC's "STATE OF MIND" about the handling of classified material on her private non-secure E-mail system.
Post a Comment