DEMOCRATS RELEASE THEIR OWN STAFF "REPORT" ABOUT THE BENGHAZI COMMITTEE TO LIBERAL BLOG, POLITICUS USA
DEMOCRATS' OWN "REPORT" EXONERATES HILLARY CLINTON --- CONDEMNS THE REPUBLICANS ON THE BENGHAZI COMMITTEE INSTEAD
According to a "report" in/on the pro-liberal-Democrat blog, "Politicus USA" --- "Democrats on the House Select Committee on Benghazi have released a damning 124-page report that finds no evidence of wrongdoing by Hillary Clinton, but a mountain of proof that the Republican-led investigation is a partisan sham...." (See "Republicans Leveled By Bombshell Report That Clears Hillary Clinton On Benghazi" by Jason Easley, 101915, Politicus USA
[http://www.politicususa.com/2015/10/19/republicans-leveled-bombshell-report-clears-hillary-clinton-benghazi.html]).
Easly's own "report" about the Democrat Staffers' "report" goes on to show just how partisan this "report" for the Democrat members on the Benghazi Committee really is:
"The report reveals that Clinton did nothing wrong and that the House Select Committee on Benghazi is nothing more than a partisan stunt that is designed to destroy the frontrunner for the Democratic nomination.
The evidence is laid out over the course of 124 brutal pages. Republicans have lied to the American people about the purposes and intentions of this committee. House Republicans have wasted millions of taxpayer dollars on an investigation that is finding nothing new.
The only evidence of wrongdoing found is on the Republican side of the aisle. The investigation into Hillary Clinton’s emails under the pretense of Benghazi is an illegal use of taxpayer funds for partisan political purposes...."
More about this "report" >>> and what the Dems are trying to pull <<< when I get it.....
8 comments:
UPDATE: THE “TREY GOWDY IS THE MAN WITH A PLAN” EDITION
REPUBLICANS ON THE HOUSE SELECT COMMITTEE ON BENGHAZI HAVE SETTLED ON A PLAN HOW TO QUESTION FORMER SECRETARY OF STATE HILLARY CLINTON
BENGHAZI COMMITTEE CHAIRMAN TREY GOWDY PROMISES THAT “HILLARY CLINTON HEARING” WILL BE “FAIR” AND FACT CENTRIC” — AND HE SAYS THAT “... ANY CHANGING OR CONTRADICTORY CLINTON STATEMENTS ... [WOULD] CALL INTO QUESTION HER CREDIBILITY
According to a report that appears on the blog “Politico” — “... Republicans on the House Benghazi Committee have settled on a plan for Thursday’s high-stakes showdown with Hillary Clinton: no cheap shots and stick to the facts — but don’t give an inch.... The seven GOP members of the panel aim to strike the right balance during Thursday’s hearing with the former secretary of state. They’re hoping a professional approach, coupled with tough questions about security in Libya, U.S. foreign policy under Clinton and her email practices will help put to rest accusations that they’re ideologues bent on hurting the Democratic front-runner in the polls — or that the panel is a waste of taxpayer money.... In a series of interviews, panel members and aides said they’re planning to touch on everything from Clinton’s hopes and dreams for Libya after the fall of Muammar Qadhafi to why she wasn’t aware of numerous requests for increased security by slain U.S. Ambassador Chris Stevens. Those [requests] were ultimately denied by State, and Stevens and three other Americans were killed in the Sept. 11, 2012, attacks on the U.S. compound in Benghazi....” (See “Benghazi GOP preps for battle with Clinton” by Rachael Bade, 10/20/15, Politico
[http://www.politico.com/story/2015/10/republicans-benghazi-hillary-clinton-gowdy-214934]).
The Rachael Bade - Politico article went on to say that, “.... [The Committee will] also inquire about a number of Clinton emails they say they’ve asked for but that Clinton never provided to [the Department of] State. And they’re going to press Clinton about statements they think call her credibility into question, such as Clinton’s claim that advice about Libya she got from her longtime ally Sid Blumenthal was ‘unsolicited.’.... Gowdy said that generally any changing or contradictory Clinton statements could be relevant because they call into question her credibility. Clinton has, for example, said she started using her email server only in the spring of 2009; but an inspector general recently found emails from that account that were sent months earlier.”
So far the Benghazi hearings have only helped Hillary
RESPONSE & UPDATE: THE “REAL AMERICAN VIEW OF HILLARY CLINTON’S BENGHAZI PERFORMANCE” EDITION
TO: "ANONYMOUS SAID... 6:36 PM": DON'T JUMP TO CONCLUSIONS — LOOK AT THE POLLING ABOUT BENGHAZI AND HILLARY'S PART IN IT — EVEN THE RESULTS ABOUT THE BENGHAZI COMMITTEE HEARINGS ARE SOMEWHAT EQUIVOCAL
BY A 2-TO-1 MARGIN, MOST AMERICANS BELIEVE THAT FORMER SECRETARY OF STATE DID NOT PROPERLY REACT TO THE 9/11/15 BENGHAZI CRISIS
According to an NBC News report, “By a nearly 2-to-1 margin, Americans say they're unsatisfied with Hillary Clinton's response to the 2012 terrorist attack in Benghazi, Libya, according to results from a new NBC News/Wall Street Journal poll....” (See “NBC/WSJ Poll: More Americans Unsatisfied With Clinton's Response to Benghazi Attack” by Mark Murray, 10/20/15, NBC News [http://www.nbcnews.com/politics/2016-election/nbc-wsj-poll-more-americans-unsatisfied-clintons-response-benghazi-attack-n448041]).
The same poll also disclosed that “.... 36 percent of Americans think the current congressional investigation into the Benghazi attacks is unfair and too partisan (that includes 53 percent of Democrats); 29 percent of Americans believe it's fair and impartial (including 50 percent of Republicans); and another 35 percent don't know enough....”
The NBC Newas report on its poll says that it was conducted from October 15th to October 18th; and it surveyed 1,000 adults (including nearly 400 by cell phone calls). This NBC News-WSJ had an overall margin of error of plus-minus 3.1 percentage points.
My guess is the Clinton foundation just donated 30 million dollars to the Obama Library
Trey Gowdy, who sounds like a howdy doody charachter, has accomplished what Hillarys consultants couldn't. Even the NY Post says in its headline, Hillary wins.
BTW: If Gowdy sounds like an inbred backwoods shitkicker its because he is. Look at his wikipedia page. His parents are first cousins.
The Democrats kept bringing up Sidney Blumenthal and the Republicans didnt want to hear it.
Are the GOP morons in DC?
Its all about Hillary getting emergency 300 million dollars for the Libyan rebels, whoever they are, and then these rebels donate 40 million to Clinton foundation. Blumenthal was the broker. Nahhh. Wouldnt wanna bring that up.
QUERY: THE "DID YOU WRITE THAT THE WAY YOU WANTED" EDITION
I'M SORRY I DON'T HAVE MY DECODER RING --- SO I REALLY DIDN'T GET ALL YOU WERE GETTING AT.....
Crickets
Post a Comment