A very recent FBI internal report labels white supremacists, black separatists, militias, abortion extremists as the main U.S. domestic extremists — it doesn’t mention any Homeland Islamist threat
Meanwhile, ISIS ( the militant group know as the Islamic State of Iraq and Greater Syria ) has already set up operations just across the wide-open U.S.– Mexico Border in Juarez
Everything has collapsed on the U.S. southern border during President Obama's watch
A copy of the unclassified, 60-page National Threat Assessment for Domestic Extremism, dated Aug. 14, was obtained by the Washington Free Beacon. It warns that the threat of domestic -origin extremism was moderate in 2013 and will remain so for this year.
According to Free Beacon, “The FBI’s most recent national threat assessment for domestic terrorism makes no reference to Islamist terror threats, despite last year’s Boston Marathon bombing and the 2009 Fort Hood shooting—both carried out by radical Muslim Americans. ***
Instead, the internal FBI intelligence report concluded in its 2013 assessment published this month that the threat to U.S. internal security from extremists is limited to attacks and activities by eight types of domestic extremist movements—none motivated by radical Islam. ***
They include anti-government militia groups and white supremacy extremists, along with “sovereign citizen” nationalists, and anarchists. Other domestic threat groups outlined by the FBI assessment include violent animal rights and environmentalist extremists, black separatists, anti- and pro-abortion activists, and Puerto Rican nationalists....” (See “FBI National Domestic Threat Assessment Omits Islamist Terrorism” by Bill Gertz, 8/29/14, Washington Free Beacon [FBI National Domestic Threat Assessment Omits Islamist Terrorism
Internal report labels white supremacists, black separatists, militias, abortion extremists main domestic extremists]).
Among several critics of the FBI report, The Washington Free Beacon quoted Patrick Poole, a domestic terrorism expert, who was extremely critical of the report’s omission of U.S. Islamist extremism, blaming “politically correct” policies at the FBI for the problem, as follows: “At the same time we have senior members of the Obama administration openly saying that it’s not a question of if but when we have a terror attack targeting the United States by ISIL, we have the FBI putting on blinders to make sure they don’t see that threat.... These politically correct policies have already allowed Americans to be killed at Fort Hood and in Boston.”
The perpetrators of those two terrorist events had been reported to the FBI by intelligence sources prior to each those events and the FBI passed on taking a more active role until after the events.
ISIS ALREADY ON THE POROUS MEXICAN BORDER
Top terrorist-watcher Andrew McCarthy, writing for National Review, highlights the findings of a Judicial Watch Report, as follows: For those of us who’ve been raising alarms about both the jihadist threat and the national-security vulnerability created by the Obama administration’s non-enforcement of the immigration laws, this is not a surprise — particularly less than two weeks before September 11. But it is nonetheless jarring to read. Judicial Watch has just put out this statement: ‘Islamic terrorist groups are operating in the Mexican border city of Ciudad Juarez and planning to attack the United States with car bombs or other vehicle born improvised explosive devices (VBIED). High-level federal law enforcement, intelligence and other sources have confirmed to Judicial Watch that a warning bulletin for an imminent terrorist attack on the border has been issued. Agents across a number of Homeland Security, Justice and Defense agencies have all been placed on alert and instructed to aggressively work all possible leads and sources concerning this imminent terrorist threat.’ ” (See “Judicial Watch: Feds’ Bulletin Describes Threat of Imminent Terrorist Attack on Southern Border” by Andrew C. McCarthy, 8/29/14, National Review/ The Corner [http://www.nationalreview.com/corner/386694/judicial-watch-feds-bulletin-describes-threat-imminent-terrorist-attack-southern]).
The whole of the National Review- Andrew McCarthy- Judicial Watch report describes a truly disturbing reality along the U.S.– Mexico Border in parts of Texas. This includes the current reality – “that the U.S. Border Patrol actually ordered officers to avoid the most crime-infested stretches because they’re ‘too dangerous’ and patrolling them could result in an ‘international incident’ of cross border shooting....”
In the meantime, let’s not forget the now-infamous words of the Obama Administration’s first Homeland Security Secretary and full-time flak, Janet Napolitano, describing the southern border is “as secure as it has ever been.” Well, if that was true when Secretary Janet said it, we can use it as a premise for a very simple conclusion >>> everything has collapsed on the Southern Border of the United States during Obama’s watch.
Oh yes of course. Now its ISIS thats going to invade our shores and seize control of Fort Hamilton army base.
ReplyDeleteI thought this blog was not afraid to confront Americas real problem. The military industrial complex as outlined by the best President this country ever had, Dwight Eisenhower.
UPDATE: THE “AFTER G.B. RAISES THREAT LEVEL, OBAMA ADMINISTRATION DOUBLES-DOWN ON POSITION THAT THERE IS NO ISLAMIST THREAT TO THE U.S. HOMELAND” EDITION
ReplyDeleteANOTHER BARACK HUSSEIN OBAMA HAND, HOMELAND SECURITY SECRETARY JEH JOHNSON SAYS THERE IS NO CREDIBLE THREAT OF ANY DOMESTIC ATTACK BY ISIS OR OTHERS
According to Newsmax, “The United States is not aware of any specific threat to the U.S. homeland from Islamic State militants, the Department of Homeland Security said on Friday after Britain raised its international terrorism threat level. *** Islamic State militants and their supporters, however, "have demonstrated the intent and capability to target American citizens overseas," Homeland Security Secretary Jeh Johnson said in a statement. He noted DHS has taken steps over the summer to strengthen security at overseas airports with direct flights to the United States.” (See “US: No Specific Threat to Homeland From Islamic State” from Thomson/Reuters, 8/29/14, Newsmax/ News Homefront [http://www.newsmax.com/Newsfront/isis-threat-homeland-isis/2014/08/29/id/591653/]).
I say we bankroll Al Quieda again to fight ISIS and start Arming Assad.
ReplyDeleteOf course all these allignments could change tomorrow.
The end result is we pay everybodys tab and then kill a half million people like we did in Iraq. Now thats what I call a Christian/Conservative.
BACKFILL: THE “MICHAEL GRIMM AS EFFICIENCY EXPERT ON THE FORMULATION OF GEO-POLITICAL STRATEGY” EDITION
ReplyDeleteGRIMM GIVES HIS "E-4/GS-11/STATEN ISLAND CONGRESSMAN’S PAYGRADE" TAKE ON HOW THE OBAMA ADMINISTRATION SHOULD ARRIVE AT ITS STRATEGY AND FOREIGN POLICY
ALREADY BORED WITH LOCAL ISSUES LIKE THE ERIC GARNER KILLING, THE SHARPTON MARCH AND RUNNING AGAINST DOMENIC RECCHIA, STATEN ISLAND REP GOES AFTER THE PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES
IS THIS A PRELUDE TO GRIMM’S CALLING FOR THE IMPEACHMENT OF OBAMA ?
Here is Congressman Grimm in his own words on Facebook: “The President doesn't have a strategy to deal with the most lethal terrorist network in the Middle East and the single greatest threat to our American servicemen and women abroad? *** That's probably because strategy is developed in the Oval Office and the Situation Room by a President determined to lead, not on the golf course or the fundraising circuit. I have criticized this President's "See no evil/Hear no evil" excuse for foreign policy time and time again, and this continued weakness on the world stage is making us and our allies less safe and emboldening those wishing to do us harm. *** The brave men and women of America's "Greatest Generation" who served in WWII and Korea did not sacrifice so much to see this country's leaders refuse to stand up for itself and its values.” (See Michael Grimm on Facebook [www.facebook.com/repmichaelgrimm]).
Does this mean the Congressman Grimm will now consider impeachment of the President ? If not, it’s all just talk anyway.
BACKFILL: THE “MICHAEL GRIMM AS EFFICIENCY EXPERT ON THE FORMULATION OF GEO-POLITICAL STRATEGY” EDITION
ReplyDeleteGRIMM GIVES HIS "E-4/GS-11/STATEN ISLAND CONGRESSMAN’S PAYGRADE" TAKE ON HOW THE OBAMA ADMINISTRATION SHOULD ARRIVE AT ITS STRATEGY AND FOREIGN POLICY
ALREADY BORED WITH LOCAL ISSUES LIKE THE ERIC GARNER KILLING, THE SHARPTON MARCH AND RUNNING AGAINST DOMENIC RECCHIA, STATEN ISLAND REP GOES AFTER THE PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES
IS THIS A PRELUDE TO GRIMM’S CALLING FOR THE IMPEACHMENT OF OBAMA ?
Here is Congressman Grimm in his own words on Facebook: “The President doesn't have a strategy to deal with the most lethal terrorist network in the Middle East and the single greatest threat to our American servicemen and women abroad? *** That's probably because strategy is developed in the Oval Office and the Situation Room by a President determined to lead, not on the golf course or the fundraising circuit. I have criticized this President's "See no evil/Hear no evil" excuse for foreign policy time and time again, and this continued weakness on the world stage is making us and our allies less safe and emboldening those wishing to do us harm. *** The brave men and women of America's "Greatest Generation" who served in WWII and Korea did not sacrifice so much to see this country's leaders refuse to stand up for itself and its values.” (See Michael Grimm on Facebook [www.facebook.com/repmichaelgrimm]).
Does this mean the Congressman Grimm will now consider impeachment of the President ? If not, it’s all just talk anyway.
The National Review? My goodness what is next Mr. Massey, a reference to the John Birch Society??? The credibility of the NR died with its founder who I am pleased to inform you did not like your pal Ayn Rand.
ReplyDeleteThe credibility of NR died long before William Buckley.
ReplyDeleteI don't know why Massey and his two close associates put up with you; or why they give you a pass on this blog (you wouldn't ever get my vote for any of your comments).
ReplyDeleteFrom now on, save your complaints about the fine Americans of the JBS until Massey (or anybody else commenting on this blog) quotes from or links to "The New American"; and I don't think Gail or the others have (I would/should have noticed, because I have occasionally served as one of his Baker Street runners and feed him links to that fine source of government and political information. I have yet to see any of it quoted, linked or even mentioned -- that isn't a complaint, it is an observation).
Since your the one that wears "her" Catholic-style Dorothy Day feminist heterodoxy on "her" sleeve; and in case you didn't know, JBS founder Robert Welch was a deathbed convert to Catholicism, do to the efforts of a man educated at St. Anselm's grammar school in Brooklyn, named McManus, and a Director of the JBS. In olden times some of the people active in the Brooklyn RTL movement and/or demonstrating at the 39th Street clinic with posters and rosaries were also JBS members or associates.
The 39th Street Clinic is closed finally. But next Saturday we will be at 81 Willoughby with Msgr. Philip Reilly himself. About three months ago Police Officer Steven McDonald and his wife Patty came along - what a Gospel-inspired moment that day was. Do come if you can. And introduce yourself - sure any friend of Mr. Massey is a friend of mine. And remember what Monsignor says, "We never demonstrate with the Rosary, we pray the Rosary. We are witnesses not protesters."
ReplyDelete/s/
Baker Street Irregular Ladies Auxiliary Saint Dorothy Day Division
What language are you people speaking ?
ReplyDeleteKeep writing dorothy
ReplyDeleteWhere is that tornado when you need it?
ReplyDeleteAnd your little dog!
I only wear my red slippers around the apartment
ReplyDeleteLooks like Judge Nocera are back.
ReplyDeleteEverything is a big joke with you guys.
ReplyDeleteIn the Alek Trabeck style that Gail wants us to use here:
ReplyDeleteWHAT WAS FRANK'S ANSWER TO THE QUESTION, "FRANK, WHAT, EXACTLY, DO YOU CARRY AROUND IN YOUR BRIEF CASE ALL THE TIME...."