>>> Fact, this item was produced as discovery material from the files and on behalf of one of the defendants, "Jack" Carroll in the federal case for damages brought against John "Jack" Carroll and others by plaintiff John Kennedy O'Hara
>>> Fact, this item was apparently "sent" to Defendant DA Hynes by four (4) named NYS Legislators and/or NYC Councilmembers in office at a time near the purported date of the "letter," the names of those legislators and/or councilmembers are typed at the end of the "letter"; however, there are no handwritten signatures, and there is no formal letterhead for any of the four --- the office holders are [were] the following: 1) Sal Albanese - City Councilman; 2) Steve DiBrienza - City Councilman; 3) Jim Brennan - State Assemblyman (and a named defendant in this lawsuit by O'Hara); and 4) Velmanette Montgomery - State Senator
>>> Fact, this item is visibly dated January 2, 1990, which is named defendant [now "... The Estate of] Charles 'Joe" Hynes' first day in office as the D.A. for Kings County
[[[ NOTE: The copy of the purported "letter" below was transferred to this blog platform in segments; and as a result, the PAGINATION and the SPACING between paragraphs is not as in the original document produced in discovery and filed in federal court --- in all other respects this is a copy of what appears as a "letter" that is apparently dated "January 2. 1990" ]]]
_______________
_______________
"...
...."
The importance of this item [whether it is proven to be an actual "letter" or a draft of such "letter"] cannot be overstressed; because, in either situation, it will be a key piece of evidence that the following defendants: "Jack" Carroll; [The Estate of] former Kings County DA Charles "Joe" Hynes; the Office of the Kings County District Attorney and the City of New York; and the various New York State actors and the defendant State of New York should be treated as both a behemoth single joint interest. and as several severable interests, under various theories of tort law in New York applicable to this federal case, both with respect to the liability and the damages aspects of O'Hara's case.
Also, this item demonstrates an early example of several instances of various so-called "progressive" politicians and multiple prosecutors in the Kings County DA's office engaging in what is now being called "lawfare" of the kind more recently being directed at Donald Trump and many of those who supported him.
That letter looks very suspicious. And oh boy! If it's real, what suspicions they might be, and who everybody would have had to have been to make it all work.
ReplyDeleteA good place to start might be asking somebody named Anne J. Swern. Back in the early political lawfare days, she was a well hooked up ADA in both the Liz Holtzman and Joe Hynes DA(s) Office(s) in Brooklyn --- meaning involvement(s) in two different cases of the ones mentioned in that suspicious letter. She also had many other dealings with the "Jack" Carroll that you have been talking about as one of the defendants in the O'Hara federal case for damages. Having been part of that stuff was very instrumental in Anne Swern's rapid progess through the Brooklyn political insider controlled process of picking judges; and for Swern it was two times, first for NYC Civil Court, and then for the NYS Supreme Court.