In a patent demonstration of disdain and disrespect for the U.S.A., Russia's >>> FOREIGN MINISTER <<< uses vulgar term referring to both of our presidential candidates
Russia is laughing it's ass off about how it is screwing around with our presidential election -- while it runs rings around us militarily and diplomatically in the rest of the world
According to CNN --- "Russian Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov has dismissed claims that his country is interfering in the US presidential election as 'ridiculous'.... In an interview with CNN's Christiane Amanpour in Moscow, Lavrov said it was 'flattering' that American officials think Russia is meddling in the election, but the accusations were baseless. [And later in CNN's Lavrov report was this:] .... Lavrov was also asked about the furor over a video that emerged last week in which Trump talked about women in lewd terms.... After pointing out that English was not his first language and that he was unsure if he would sound 'decent,' Lavrov said: 'There are so many pussies around the presidential campaign on both sides that I prefer not to comment.'..." (See "Lavrov denies Russian influence over US election" by
Did we ever get those missiles out of Turkey?
ReplyDeleteLets get back to Trump.
ReplyDeleteIf a republican Senate candidate pulls support from Trump it angers his base and in a close race thats bad for GOP. It gets you nothing from dems. In short, Trump will cause GOP to lose Senate, or, make Kaine the deciding vote.
RESPONSE: THE "AS HILLARY SAID..." EDITION
ReplyDeleteOR HOW SHE DOES IT WITHOUT THAT "MONA LISA SMILE..."
TO: "ANONYMOUS SAID... AT 9:29 AM"
Your question about "Turkey" puts me in mind of one of the >>> earlier hearings<<< about Benghazi. Hillary was asked if Ambassador Stevens was in Benghazi in connection with a then-covert gun-running operation to undefined "Syrian rebels" (some of which were or soon became ISIS) with a cut-out/stop-off in Turkey. After the question was put to then Sec/State Clinton she answered with this: "TUR-KEEEEE !!!???" [and her now classic blinking eyes and bobbing head tic].
Although it might not have been enough to turn Donald Trump's head, I thought it was a thing of beauty --- more impressive to me than the Mona Lisa. (Cue the Nat King Cole.....)
PS: THE "WHAT IT REALLY MEANS" EDITION
ReplyDeleteDON'T FORGET THAT THE SONG "MONA LISA" IS A SIGNAL OF BETRAYAL FROM THE ALAN LADD MOVIE, "CAPTAIN CAREY U.S.A."
"REAL NEWS": THE "DEFCON-3" EDITION
ReplyDeleteEVEN THOUGH OUR MILITARY INFRASTRUCTURE REMAINS FORMALLY AT THE LOWEST READINESS LEVEL, "DEFCON-5" --- THERE ARE REPORTS THAT THE HIGHEST LEVEL COMMAND AND CONTROL HUBS AND MANY OTHER I/C4 NODES ARE BEING MANNED (SEXIST !!!) AND OPERATED AT A MUCH HIGHER "DEFCON-3" LEVEL
AT THE SAME TIME SOME MEDIA OUTLETS ARE PUTTING OUT STORIES THAT THE DANGER OF A RUSSIA-AMERICA NUCLEAR CONFRONTATION ARE HIGHER THAN AT ANY TIME SINCE 1973 (WHEN THERE WAS ALMOST AN "ACCIDENTAL" NUCLEAR SHOWDOWN BETWEEN US & THE USSR DURING THE '73 ARAB-ISRAELI WAR
Okay, so it's only "The Daily Star" and several right-wing blogs but that's the buzz out there.....
But, Russia has ordered all families and non-essential personnel back home from it's embassies, consuls and missions in the USA, because of war fears..... That ain't nothin' !!!
OH ! AND THEN THERE'S CRAZY JOE BIDEN THREATENING RUSSIA WITH AN "ACT OF WAR"
Joseph Biden, the VPOTUS, in a TV interview, has mentioned a possible U.S. cyber attack [currently viewed as an "Act of War"] against Russia. HMMMM ??? !!!
What a changing world We Line in.
ReplyDeleteAssange is leaking great stuff about Hillary Goldman speeches, but, it is all drowned out by Trump speeches about how ugly these accusers are. Assange is helping Trump but you can't blame him. After 2 years in Ecuadors Embassy I'd do anything to get out.
wiki leaks is coming out of ecuador embassy in england. the building looks like 10 Rillington Place.
ReplyDeleteBACKFILL & QUERY: THE "NUMBER '11' KEEPS POPPING UP" EDITION
ReplyDeleteSEVERAL TIMES THE NUMBER "11" HAS BEEN MENTIONED BY MSM REPORTERS AND/OR COMMENTATOTRS AS THE TOTAL NUMBER OF WOMEN WHO HAVE CLAIMED THAT DONALD TRUMP FORCED SOME KIND OF UNWANTED SEXUAL CONTACT UPON THEM
HOW DID THESE VARIOUS MAINSTREAM MEDIA OUTLETS GET THE NUMBER "11" WHEN AT THE TIME(S)ONLY THE ACCUSATIONS OF 2, 3, 4... 9 OF THEM HAD BEEN PUT FORWARD --- AND SOME OTHER MSM OUTLETS WERE SUCCESSIVELY REPORTING THE "TOTALS" AS LOWER NUMBERS, BUT GROWING DAILY --- OR --- AT THE OTHER END OF THE BELL CURVE “MOTHER JONES” WAS SAYING THE NUMBER IS “17”
THE RECURRANCE OF THE NUMBER “11” DOES SUGGEST AN “UNSEEN HAND” MIGHT BE COORDINATING THINGS BEHIND THE SCENES ON THIS STORY
Earlier this week, very early on Thursday morning, I noted that "... CNN reported that there might be eleven (11) accusers, but I don't know where that number came from and/or how/why CNN believes it to be so..." (See sub-headline to my 10/13/16 main post below, "UNTITLED JOTS ABOUT THE LATEST ANTI-TRUMP MSM FRENZY" [http://galewynmassey.blogspot.com/2016/10/untitled-jots-about-latest-anti-trump.html#comments]). That observation or "...JOT..." was from something unusual that I saw and heard on CCN late in the evening on 10/12/16, at the time only two or three Trump accusers had been reported as coming forward --- and that there might be a total of eleven (11) Trump accusers seemed an odd and out-of-place factoid.
Since then, I've seen that number "11" pop up here and there in the reporting or commentary about the Trump accusers (See e.g.: “Here are 11 women who made allegations against Trump this week” by William Cummings & Eliza Collins, 10/14/16, USA Today, WCNC (NBC News, Charlotte) [http://www.wcnc.com/news/politics/elections/here-are-11-women-who-made-allegations-against-trump-this-week/336185983]; “All of Donald Trump’s Accusers: a timeline of every alleged grope and assault – At least eleven women….” by Gideon Resnick, 10/14/16, The Daily Beast [http://www.thedailybeast.com/articles/2016/10/12/all-of-donald-trump-s-accusers-a-timeline-of-every-alleged-grope-and-assault.html] [NOTE: the “2016/10/12” date in this item’s http] ; “Is 2016 a Watershed Moment for Women? -- Donald Trump’s sex scandals have clearly hit a nerve. 11 women…” by Politico Magazine, 10/14/16, Politico [http://www.politico.com/magazine/story/2016/10/2016-sexual-assault-allegations-watershed-moment-for-women-214355] [this article has a completely different focus, but it is an odd coincidence that it so prominently mentions “11 women” in connection with the Trump sex scandals]; “Two More Women Accuse Trump Of Sexual Assault” by Joanne Flowers, 10/16/16, Consumer Connection[http://crcconnection.com/2016/10/16/two-more-women-accuse-trump-of-sexual-assault.html][in the body of this article is the following: “…. Eleven women came forward this week to allege sexual misconduct by Donald Trump in cases that echo the vulgar conduct he described in the 2005 Access Hollywood tape surfaced this week….” However the article does not discuss how that number is calculated, and it doesn’t discuss eleven victims]).
I again have to wonder why this recurrent number “11” keeps reappearing as the total of Trump accusers; some unseen hand seems to be at work here. If there is some kind of media coordination, where might it be coming from ????