Gallo's petition to open the Independence line gave his opponent Ben Akselrod a chance to stay on the November ballot
The very strong social conservative Democrat Ben Akselrod was "all in" in his Democratic primary fight, which he narrowly lost to incumbent Assemblyman Steve Cymbrowitz. Nonetheless, he lived to fight another day because of a strategic blunder by his Republican counterpart Russell Gallo.
For reasons that are still not very clear, even though he already had two solid lines on the November General Election ballot, the Republican and Conservative Parties' lines, GOP insider Russell Gallo attempted to get a third line by opening the Independence line to a write-in primary by filing enough signatures on an opportunity to ballot petition. Whatever the Gallo-Berardelli strategy might have been at the beginning, it all ultimately proved to be a counterproductive waste of time, effort and resources when Gallo lost the write-in primary to Ben Akselrod.
As I reported in November shortly after the election, in the post " Craig Eaton's Brooklyn GOP "Rebirth" is a breached delivery in 2012" the result in the Cymbrowitz-Gallo-Akselrod 45th AD race was as follows:
State Assembly - District 45 - General
83 of 83 Precincts Reporting - 100%
Name Party Votes Vote %
Cymbrowitz, Steven (i) Dem 10,970 55%
Gallo, Russell GOP/Cons 5,141 26%
Akselrod, Ben Indp 3,938 20%
Clearly the closest race was between Gallo and Akselrod, in which Gallo running on both the Republican and Conservative Party lines bested his Independence Party opponent Akselrod by only twelve hundred votes, while losing to his Democratic Party opponent, Steve Cymbrowitz by more than two-to-one. Even if Gallo would have obtained all of the Independence Party line votes that Mr. Akselrod had garnered (and he certainly would not have been able to do that) he would still have lost to Cymbrowitz.
Thus all that was accomplished by the Gallo-Berardelli strategy of opening the Independence Party line for a write in primary was: 1) Gallo lost the write-in primary to Ben Akselrod, allowing Akselrod's name to appear on the General Election ballot; 2) Gallo almost lost to two Democratic opponents in the 2012 General Election; and 3) Gallo did not get as a good a vote on the Republican and Conservative lines in 2012 as Joseph Hayon did in 2010.
Whoever gives any credibility whatsoever to Gene Berardelli and/or Russell Gallo, either as "spokesmen" of the Brooklyn GOP, as experienced political operatives in Southwest Brooklyn or as master mechanics of the political machinery in Brooklyn does so at their own peril.
What did they expect?
ReplyDeleteGallo wasn't right for the district. 25% to 30% was all he could expect -- it's all he ever gets whenever he gets the bright idea that he's candidate material.
Berardelli, the narcisitic barriatric brain trust, what an adviser!
Earlier today, as I was trying to engage in my morning's "Error 503 -- Service Unavailable -- Guru Meditation," I was surprised at a pop-up by one Gatemouth on Room 8 mentioning the above post about Messrs. Gallo and Berardelli.
ReplyDeleteTo the Gateman: As Sarah P. would say, "Back Atcha!" Loved the petard and hoist play... ( btw, I believe it's pronounced "hurst" both in Brooklyn and at "The Globe")