Look out ! >>> This means there is some very creative flim-flam coming to try to stem the cascade of evidence coming in against the Biden's international corruption enterprise
Stay on your toes for a while !!! This might move very fast.....
--- OR POSSIBLY ---
Relax !!!!! This might move very slowly.....
More on this as it develops.....
UPDATE AND BACKFILL: THE "EVEN SOME AT CNN THINK THIS SPECIAL COUNSEL" APPOINTMENT IS PROBLEMATIC" EDITION
ReplyDeleteOn Friday, the CNN anchor of “CNN News Central” Jake Tapper said that many Republicans do have “legitimate questions” concerning US Attorney General Merrick Garland’s decision to appoint the US Attorney for Delaware David Weiss as a "Special Counsel" to investigate Hunter Biden....
According to Jake Tapper >>> “I think there are some legitimate questions about this whole situation. First of all, I do think it’s fair to question why would U.S. Attorney Weiss be appointed to special counsel. Usually, a special counsel [comes in as] an outside attorney. Now, it has happened before, Durham came from inside, and the attorney general has the right to do that, but it is odd.... [Also, t]his plea deal was picked apart by the judge. So, one could ask, why would you stick with the [same] U.S. attorney if he, you know, this was a failure, a colossal failure? The two sides had not even agreed upon what was in that plea deal [for Huneter Biden]. And then I think there are questions about whether or not it was harsh enough, this plea deal.”
To top it all off, Tapper concluded that this move By US AG GARLAND makes it seem as though, the whistleblowers might have been right; and what they were alleging might well have been true, and Weiss hadn't been able to charge whatever he wanted to charge, and now maybe he does. So there are a lot of questions about all of that; thus, that's why some of the political questions now being raised by some Republicans do have merit.
And Sam Bankman Fraud was just put in jail. I guess giving Schumer 32 mill only goes so far.
ReplyDeleteANNOUNCEMENT; UPDATE & BACKFILL: THE "FOR THOSE THAT MIGHT STILL BE INTERESTED IN THE DUMB & DUMBER AND THEN EVEN DUMBER & DUMBER THAN BEFORE GUY" EDITION
ReplyDeleteTHE BUFFOON THAT GIVES EVERY INDICATION THAT HE IS EITHER BRIAN FOX OR ONE OF "HIS WELL-TRAINED AND HIGHLY DISCIPLINED OPERATIVES" [SIC] HAS CONTINUED TO ATTEMP PUBLISHING HIS/HER/ITS SILLY RIFFS ON THE "EATON LONG-TERM PLAN" THAT IS UP AND RUNNING RIGHT NOW --- AFTER EATON'S HAVING SUCCESSFULLY CAUSED A GOP PRIMARY ALONG WITH AVERY PEREIRA, AND GOP COUNCIL WOMAN INNA VERNIKOV WITH ANN BELFIORE-DELFAUS IN OPPOSITION TO THE BROOKLYN GOP'S AND CONSERVATIVE PARTY'S SELL-OUT TO THE SOVIET KGB-TYPE SPY ARI KAGAN
HOWEVER, EVEN THOUGH THAT BUFFOON, WHOEVER IT MIGHT BE, HAS TRIED POSTING ON MORE RECENT COMMENTS THREADS, INCLUDING THIS ONE, AFTER THREE DAYS OF FAILED TRYING >>> "... ON THE CLEARLY MARKED CLOSED COMMENTS THREAD...." --->>> NONE OF HIS/HER/ITS "SILLY RIFFS ON THE [FUTURE START OF] EATON'S PLAN WILL BE APPEARING ANY TIME SOON, BECAUSE THEY ARE ALL BRIAN FOX-STYLE FAKE NEWS LIES THAT ALSO FAIL AS HUMOROUS BARBS AGAINST EATON, BECAUSE THEY LACK WHIT, ORIGINALITY, MATERIALITY, RELEVANCE, AND/OR COMPETENCE.....
The question begs >>> is this what Ari Kagan is paying the grifter/charlatan Brian Fox to do for him with Kagan's 2023 campaign matching funds ?????
On August 7th Federal Judge Cannon in Florida ordered Jack Smith to explain by august 22 why he has a Grand Jury in DC investigating an on going case in Florida. Is that constitutional? Nobody knows because its never happened before. According to one press account even if using the DC Grand Jury is precluded by DOJ policy Smith says it won't matter because he is not bound by DOJ policy.
ReplyDeleteThen what is Smith bound by?
641, has Special Counsel Jack Smith already committed several prosecutorial improprieties and provided Donald Trump several substantive and procedural defenses to Smith's two separate indictments, one of which has also been augmented and supplemented?
ReplyDeleteNote: A "Special Counsel" remains under the DOJ umbrella and he reports to USAG Merrick Garland; according to the Code of Federal Regulations, a special counsel must have “a reputation for integrity and impartial decisionmaking,” as well as “an informed understanding of the criminal law and Department of Justice policies.” Though they’re not subject to the day-to-day supervision of the Justice Department, special counsels must still comply with department regulations, policies and procedures. They also technically report to the attorney general, who arguably is the one government official who can fire them.
This is all an ersatz procedure being used to bring ersatz criminal charges against President Trump for one and only one reason: to keep him from retaking the Presidency by all lawful means.
Trump and his supporters did that throughout 2020, and all the way through the Congressional Certification process, which was sidetracked by a cabal of federal and non-federal actors, some in the Congress, and others in the federal security forces in and for DC, amd along with paid professional agitators to created the false flag disturbances at the Capitol on January 6th, 2021, allowing the cabal to avoid the procedural objections to the votes of certain Electors, which had been raised timely and lawfully by several Senators and House Members.
Much of the evidence of that cabal's January 6th conspiracy was discovered and then concealed by the January 6th Committee; and along the way it has been intentionally destroyed.
I suspect Jack Smith is being advised by Nick.
ReplyDeleteSpeaking of Nick Chambers he was Averys campaign manager. Where is he?
ReplyDelete709, he's around consulting and being about as useful to Ari Kagan and Ted Ghorra as Brian Fox, but doing it at a much better price.
ReplyDeleteWhat kind of father lets his son take the fall for his own crimes?
ReplyDeleteUPDATE & BACKFILL [PART 1 of 2]: THE"YOU GOTTA LUV THESE DEMOCRAT CONGRESSMEN --- THEY CAN MAKE US ALL LAUGH TOGETHER" EDITION
ReplyDeleteTHIS WEEK'S DEMOCRAT TALKING POINTS ON THE SUNDAY SHOWS ARE SO RIDICULOUS THAT THEY ARE FALL-DOWN LAUGHABLE >>> TRUMP INVENTED FAMILIAL GOVERNMENTAL CORRUPTION <<< AND >>> TRUMP'S THREATS TO POLITICIZE THE DOJ BLEW UP THE HUNTER BIDEN PLEA DEAL IN THE DELAWARE FEDERAL COURT <<<
[[[What makes this all so >>> LOL <<< hilarious is that not only are Congressmen Jamie Raskin and Dan Goldman being deadly serious --- but their host-interviewers Jonathan Karl and Jake Tapper are almost reverential thoughout]]]
Let's start with Maryland Democrat Jamie Raskin. Representative Raskin said on ABC'S Sunday show “This Week” that former President Donald Trump used government as an “instrument for private self-enrichment." And he continued, "During the Trump administration, we saw the development of a completely new public philosophy which is that government is not an instrument of the common good in the common instrument, government is for the private self-enrichment for the guy that gets in, for his family and his private businesses, and that’s a model we’re seeing all over the world....”
And when ABC anchor Jonathan Karl prompted, “You don’t approve of that model, obviously.”
Raskin answered, “I do not. That’s what Putin is doing.” But then he continued with this: "“It’s new for America that somebody would get in and just say, you know, everything is corrupt, and I’m just as corrupt as the next guy, and I’m going to take money as Trump did from China, from Saudi Arabia, from the United Arab Emirates. Look, you know, his son-in-law Jared Kushner, pocketed a cool $2 billion.... I’m concerned, not just about public officials like Donald Trump and Jared Kushner, but even family members who go along for the ride, and I’ve been begging my colleague, Chairman Comer, for us to do a serious analysis
of what the laws should be about money making....”
Raskin finished with this: "[W]e’re going to release a report about all of the foreign government emoluments, millions of dollars, we can document that Donald Trump pocketed at the hotels at the golf courses to business deals when he was president and that his family got. But they’ve not laid a glove on Joe Biden. As President, they haven’t been able to show any criminal corruption on his part — what they’ve got is Hunter Biden....”
[CONTINUED IN PART 2 BELOW]
UPDATE & BACKFILL CONTINUED: THE"YOU GOTTA LUV THESE DEMOCRAT CONGRESSMEN --- THEY CAN MAKE US ALL LAUGH TOGETHER" EDITION
ReplyDelete[PART 2 of 2]
.... Maybe even funnier than Raskin though was this from Brooklyn-Manhattan Congressman Dan Goldman on CNN's Sunday “State of the Union” >>> when he said that Hunter Biden’s plea agreement in the federal court in Delaware broke down because of the threat of Donald Trump’s weaponization of the Department of Justice if he were to become president again.
This is what Goldman said to Jake Tapper: “No one knows what the evidence [against Hunter Biden] is, so when they say this is a sweetheart deal, they are blowing smoke because they have no idea. And so this is, to my mind, having been a federal prosecutor for ten years, not at all a sweetheart deal. This is something routinely treat treated in a civil way, through civil penalties, not criminally. Yet Hunter Biden was charged with crimes. This is a five-year investigation. They looked at everything. We know that from testimony in the Oversight Committee. They had foreign bank records. They had domestic bank records, hundreds of thousands of documents. and this is ultimately what they thought they could charge.... Now, in the ordinary course, you would not give immunity for other conduct than what is charged. But this is not the ordinary course because you have a petty, vindictive bully running for president on the Republican Party who will use revenge and weaponize the Department of Justice to potentially charge Hunter Biden.... So even though I’m sure Hunter Biden has confidence that David Weiss will not charge him with additional crimes, They have no confidence that if Donald Trump wins that he would weaponize the Department of Justice to charge Hunter Biden, go back and charge him. That’s why this plea agreement has broken down, because of the threat of Donald Trump’s weaponization of the Department of Justice if he were to become president....”
Democrats like Goldman and Raskin have become parodies of themselves, but they seem to be the last ones to get the joke. Then again, since neither Jake Tapper nor Jon Karl cracked a smile, maybe Goldman and Raskin aren't the very last ones not to get the joke.
Dan Goldman sez the dumbest things
ReplyDeleteIt's worse than Watergate.
ReplyDeleteWe need a cage fight Eaton v Ghorra.
ReplyDelete457, nobody would watch; nobody cares; and almost nobody knows who they are.
ReplyDeleteOne of Ted Ghorra's and Jerry Kassar's really bad ideas is supporting Vito LaBella on the Conservative Party line against the Republican candidate Ying Tan in the 43rd City Council District.
ReplyDeleteNot only does Vito LaBella live well outside the district where he is running, he says that he hates Brooklyn with a passion, and that he prefers being at his home in Cape Cod, Massachusetts.
In addition to all that, Vito LaBella is an effete snob aesthete, whose idea of campaigning is not talking about the real problems inside the 43rd City Council District, but instead discussing the ins and outs of the administration changes at Fiorello H. LaGuardia High School of Music & Art and Performing Arts in Manhattan near Lincoln Center, one of his pet specialized high schools for "the beautiful people..."
Vito would make a great President of the PTA.
ReplyDelete