Look at two of the most recent postings on Ari Kagan's political social media account:
First this, to get families with children to come out and watch his movie "co-sponsored with NYC...":
"Ari Kagan... Saturday, June 10, 2023 at 9:39 AM...
...."
and then this on the very evening of June 10th at the event:
"Ari Kagan... Happening now in Scarangella Park, Gravesend. My office - in partnership with NYC Department of Parks - is hosting a Movie Night “Strange World”. Kids and their parents are happy. We are also serving popcorn and snacks. Everyone is enjoying a great weather, a cool movie and a good company.... Thank you, my wonderful staff Jeannine Cherichetti and Erica Turner, for assistance!..."
Are the Republican and Conservative Party Chairmen, Ghorra and Kassar, supportive of their candidate Ari Kagan's presentation to families with children of Disney's very Woke first time presentation of LBGTQ+ themes in a movie aimed at children ?????
Don't forget that it wasn't that long ago that both Fox News and the New York Post were reporting that :
".... The film ["Strange World"] also features the first openly LGBTQ+ teenaged Disney character, who discusses his crush in the movie...." and that "... the film [was] bombing [at the box office]...." And “.... In some cases, parents are avoiding content with sexual conversations [like Disney's "Strange World"]. Parents are [savvier] today. They use social media and get feedback on films [like "Strange World"] from their peers either online or in person....” Fox and the NY Post quoted a nonwoke film critic, who said that >>> "There could be multiple reasons for the film’s poor performance, but noted that discussion of sexuality in a children’s movie “certainly didn’t help the film’s box office fortunes.”
The movie that Ari Kagan co-presented last night along with the NYC Parks Department >>> as appropriate for families with children of all ages <<< in a City-owned park in Brooklyn was about an explorer family called the "Clades." In the movie, a young male character named "Ethan" talked to his grandfather about his same-sex crush on another boy.
Gail, you just don't get any of what is really happening at all. The Ari Kagan endorsement is only a symptom and not the disease itself that is now ravaging the Brooklyn GOP and the Conservative Party.
ReplyDeleteThanks to people like your friends, Marty Golden, John Quaglione, Liam McCabe, Brian Fox , Ted Ghorra, Jerry Kassar, Fran Vella-Marrone, and some other RINOs and faux-Conservatives only pushing their phony BIG LIES ONLY campaign agenda matters; EVERYTHING ELSE gets ignored, or sometimes it's even swept under the rug like this Ari Kagan-NYC sponsored woke LBGTQ+ Disney movie for kids that Kagan proudly announced was shown last night to a large number of happy families with children.
As a result, the Disney and NYC Bd of Ed versions of the WOKE GROOMING OF KIDS as sex objects aganda is being firmly put into place in Brooklyn; and that part of the LBGQT+ agenda is now being fostered in Brooklyn by using things like the Kagan-sponsored Disney movie to win the hearts and minds of many families with children.
Will be a blow to the public reputation of Eaton if Avery cant beat this guy.
ReplyDeleteEDITORIAL RE-POST OF A COMMENT WE JUST MADE ON ANOTHER COMMENTS THREAD TO AN EARLIER FEATURED POST: THE "THIS IS IMPORTANT ENOUGH FOR US TO SAY IT TWICE" EDITION
ReplyDelete================
================
UPDATE & BACKFILL: THE "IT DOESN'T GET ANY DIRTIER THAN THIS --- AND THE MSM IS REPORTING ABOUT IT" EDITION
ACCORDING TO A CNN INTERVIEW WITH TRUMP'S FORMER ATTORNEY JIM TRUSTY --- THE BIDEN-GARLAND-SMITH PROSECUTION TEAM AGAINST TRUMP OFFERED A FEDERAL JUDGESHIP "SITTING ON BIDEN'S DESK" TO THE LAWYER OF WALT NAUTA, WHO WAS NAMED IN TRUMP'S INDICTMENT AS A CO-CONSPIRATOR --- ALL THAT NAUTA'S LAWYER STANLEY WOODWARD HAD TO DO TO GET THE JUDGESHIP WAS SOMEHOW MAKE HIS CLIENT NAUTA "FLIP" AND BECOME A WITNESS AGAINST TRUMP.....
NOW, IT REALLY CAN'T GET ANY WORSE THAN THAT CAN IT ???
BUT WAIT, MAYBE IT CAN --- SO, WE'LL ALL HAVE TO WAIT AND SEE ABOUT THAT.....
Not only was the Jim Trusty interview by Caitlin Collins broadcast by CNN, it is being reported-on by SALON, as follows" ".... Trusty, who appeared on CNN Thursday evening after the former president was indicted by a federal grand jury in Miami, went after federal prosecutor Jay Bratt, the Justice Department's counterintelligence chief, who last year urged a court to seal the affidavit that supported a search of Mar-a-Lago that uncovered classified material.... 'I have a theory that maybe some of the outrageous misconduct has affected the equation in some other case, a potential target,' Trusty said.... His allegations involved discussions concerning the lawyer representing Trump's valet, Walt Nauta. Trusty claimed that federal prosecutors – while attempting to gather potential witnesses to strengthen their case against Trump – brought up the fact that Nauta's lawyer, Stanley Woodward, had applied for a judgeship.... Trusty, who appeared on CNN Thursday evening after the former president was indicted by a federal grand jury in Miami, went after federal prosecutor Jay Bratt, the Justice Department's counterintelligence chief, who last year urged a court to seal the affidavit that supported a search of Mar-a-Lago that uncovered classified material.... "I have a theory that maybe some of the outrageous misconduct has affected the equation in some other case, a potential target," Trusty said.... His allegations involved discussions concerning the lawyer representing Trump's valet, Walt Nauta. Trusty claimed that federal prosecutors – while attempting to gather potential witnesses to strengthen their case against Trump – brought up the fact that Nauta's lawyer, Stanley Woodward, had applied for a judgeship.... In a conversation with Woodward, Bratt mentioned that the lawyer, who had an extensive background, had pursued a judgeship in D.C. Trusty claimed that the prosecutors used this information as a means of applying "extortion" pressure, simply by introducing the topic of Woodward's career aspirations.... 'He, apparently along with five other people in his presence from DOJ, extorted a very well respected, very intelligent lawyer from Washington D.C., saying essentially if you want this judgeship that's on Joe Biden's desk, you have to flip your guy to cooperate against the president of the United States,' Trusty said...."
And now, MSNBC is reporting on the Salon article about the CNN interview by Caitlin Collins.....
oh boy that 12:17 comment about that Judgeship story on CNN is something. I dont think the offer still stands.
ReplyDeleteUPDATE & BACKFILL: THE "WOW !!! IT"S NOW BEEN FOUR DAYS --- AND --- THE BROOKLYN GOP & ITS CITY COUNCIL CANDIDATES HAVE NOT BEEN HEARD FROM CONCERNING THE OUTRAGEOUS FEDERAL INDICTMENT OF DONALD TRUMP" EDITION
ReplyDeleteNOW, IT'S BEEN LOTS OF TIME TO THINK ABOUT ALL KINDS OF THINGS SINCE THE RIDICULOUS CHARGES AGAINST GOP PRESIDENTIAL FRONT-RUNNER DONALD TRUMP AND HIS SO-CALLED "VALET" WALT NAUTA BY BIDEN'S AND GARLAND'S "SPECIAL COUNSEL" JACK SMITH HAD BEEN ANNOUNCED
IN SPITE OF THE PASSAGE OF A SIGNIFICANT PERIOD OF TIME SINCE THE DETAILS OF THE 37 COUNTS CONTAINED IN THE CHARGES CHARGES HAD BEEN MADE PUBLIC THREE DAYS AGO, NEITHER BROOKLYN GOP CHAIRMAN TED GHORRA NOR ANY SPOKESPERSON FOR THE BROOKLN GOP --- OR ANY OF THE 2023 BROOKLYN GOP CANDIDATES FOR NY CITY COUNCIL HAVE SAID ANYTHING OR DONE SOMETHING TO SHOW ANY KIND OF SUPPORT FOR THE NATION'S TOP REPUBLICAN AND THE PROHIBITIVE GOP FRONT-RUNNER FOR THE 2024 REPUBLICAN PRESIDENTIAL NOMINATION >>> FORMER PRESIDENT TRUMP
Obviously, these so-called local Republicans are making a very strong case that they are "NEVER-TRUMPERS" and anti-MAGA RINOs..... And their continued failure to support the leading GOP presidential contender for 2024 against this ersatz persecution and these phony charges means that whatever real Republicans might remain in Brooklyn >>> they shouldn't lift a finger to support the Brooklyn GOP or its candidates for anything that they might be doing during 2023.
We here at this independent Republican blog for Brooklyn and Staten Island remain on watch over the Brooklyn GOP on these particular and the handfull Republican bags of puss involved. And we hereby reiterate what we said yesterday. >>> Wait to see what we'll do to them --- if they continue to let Trump and his MAGA Republican supporters hang out to dry, as they have for four days so far.....
Gailymann don't be a girlymann, what ever happened to your 'research"' about some 'Mr. Big' in Bay Ridge and a possible murder that was called suicide almost exactly thirty-three years ago?
ReplyDeleteI think I know who your 'Mr. Big' is. Didn't he change his name once or twice, and doesn't he have a birthday around this time of June that was mentioned in connection with the suicide story?
If so, then I think I have some stuff that you need to see or hear about him privately, and it includes several instances of his paranoia and very bad temper, especially when he is confronted.
At 4:08 PM, and Galewyn Massey, I am sort of a "distant family relative" of the alleged "suicide" victim in Bay Ridge of more than thirty years ago; and I knew her pretty well, and I remember this stuff pretty well too.
ReplyDeleteThere is no doubt that she died in a second floor office on 7th Avenue in Bay Ridge near 86th Street, but almost nobody in the family believes that their, daughter, sister, sister-in-law, and/or cousin killed herself how she was found in the BRAVO offices in June 1990. Neither did at least one IAS detective, who was involved investigating the case.
More important, when the victim's parents met the person, who some here are calling "Mr. Big," at the 86th Street Nathan's, which was less than a whole city block from where the parents' daughter had been found dead from a gsw to the head in an office at BRAVO. Even though Mr. Big met them at Nathan's, he wouldn't talk to them about any of the disputed facts that had come to their attention during the NYPD investigations shortly after their daughter's death, he only shouted that he made his statements to the police and local papers, but that he didn't have to answer their crazy questions about any coverups about the killing of their daughter, and he ran away.
Is it Armand Starace
ReplyDeleteDidn't he join the Village People?
ReplyDeleteUPDATE & BACKFILL: THE "NBC NEWS SOURCE CONFIRMED ATTORNEY FOR TRUMP CO-DEFENDANT WALT NAUTA MADE HIS OWN CHARGE OF PR0SECUTORIAL MISCONDUCT AGAINST JAY BRATT AND OTHERS AT THE DOJ" EDITION
ReplyDeleteA DAY AFTER THE MATTER WAS INITIALLY MENTIONED BY TRUMP LAYWER JIM TRUSTY DURING A CNN INTERVIEW --- WHICH MANY IN THE MSM CALLED BIZARRE --- AN NBC NEWS SOURCE TOLD NBC REPORTERS THAT STANLEY WOODWARD, COUNSEL FOR WALT NAUTA, NOW A CO-DEFENDANT WITH FORMER PRESIDENT TRUMP IN THE SECRET DOCUMENTS CASE AGAINST TRUMP HAS ALLEGED IN COURT PAPERS FILED UNDER SEAL WITH THE CHIEF FEDERAL JUDGE OF THE D.C. COURT THAT DOJ ATTORNEYS WERE GUILTY OF MISCONDUCT EARLIER DURING THE INVESTIGATION LEADING UP TO THE INDICTMENTS OF TRUMP AND NAUTA
According to a report by NBC News, the lawyer for Trump’s so-called "butler and body man, Walt Nauta" made his own allegations against a Biden/Garland DOJ official that complained about the DOJ official's having mentioned Nauta's attorney's application for a judgeship in D.C. during a meeting at the DOJ concerning his client in October 2022. According to an NBC News source, the lawyer for Nauta, Stanley Woodward, had made the charge in a letter to the court that was filed under seal,
The NBC News source said that in a letter filed under seal with the chief federal judge in Washington, Standley Woodward claimed that Jay Bratt, the Justice Department’s chief of counterintelligence, had raised the issue of Woodward's application for a judgeship at a meeting during October 2022 at the Justice Department, where the DOJ prosecution team was trying to convince Woodward that Nauta had lied to those investigating Donald Trump; and that instead, Nauta should cooperate in the investigation. At the time, NBC reports Bratt had been working for more than a year on the classified documents case against Trump. That meeting would have been sometime before "crazy" Jack Smith was brought into the case by Merrick Garland to be "special counsel" on the case.
Jack Smith has had high profile political cases that all failed.
ReplyDelete1007, maybe that's why Trump and Trump-folks call him "Crazy Jack Smith".
ReplyDelete10:07, Trump has lost most of his cases. lol
ReplyDelete659, Trump has been very successful surfing the U.S. legal system for decades - he's made billions of dollars, and he has been elected POTUS twice in 2016 and 2020. He would have been inaugurated on January 20, 2021, except for cowardly Pence allowing the electors' votes unlawfully chosen in the key states stolen in the 2020 election to be counted on January 6-7th, 2021 without considering pending timely and properly asserted objectings and motions by members of the U.S. Congress, both House and Senate.
ReplyDelete7:25 -- lol.
Delete725, ’Twas brillig, and the slithy toves
ReplyDeleteDid gyre and gimble in the wabe:
All mimsy were the borogoves,
And the mome raths outgrabe ...
853, you shouldn't quote pedos; people might get the wrong idea. Then again, maybe you...
ReplyDelete