Nate Silver indicates that the Georgia result tomorrow is likely to be inconclusive --- BUT --- Silver’s Georgia tea leaves might be predictive of how things might go in Southwest Brooklyn come September & November
According
to Nate Silver’s most recent look at tomorrow’s special election in
Georgia, “If
the polls are right, then Democrat Jon Ossoff will receive by far
the most votes in Georgia’s 6th Congressional District, which is holding a
special election to replace former U.S. Rep. Tom Price on Tuesday. But Ossoff will probably finish with
less than 50 percent of the vote, which would trigger a runoff between him and
the next-highest finisher — most likely the Republican Karen Handel, but
possibly one of three other Republicans (Bob Gray, Dan Moody Judson Hill) who
are closely bunched behind her in polls….
Furthermore, the combined vote for all Republican candidates will
probably exceed the combined vote for Ossoff and other Democrats, although it
should be close. And the district has historically been Republican-leaning,
although it was much less so in the 2016 election than it had been previously.
All of this makes for a fairly confusing set of circumstances and a
hard-to-forecast outcome….” (See “Handicapping The
Georgia 6 Special Election” by Nate
Silver, 4/17/17, FiveThirtyEight [https://fivethirtyeight.com/features/handicapping-the-georgia-6-special-election/]).
WHAT DOES THIS HAVE TO DO WITH WHO GETS TO BE THE “TOP BANANA” OUT OF A BUNCH THAT IN MID-APRIL INCLUDES: BRANNAN, ABBATE, EL YATEEM, TONG, CARROLL, CAPANO, MC CABE & QUAGLIONE ? ? ?
Maybe, tomorrow’s vote in Georgia will be more conclusive
about what will happen in Bay Ridge, Bensonhurst and Bath Beach, Brooklyn, in November than who actually will be
the replacement in congress for HHS Secretary Tom Price after tomorrow….. When you get into the guts of the Nate
Silver analysis, you’ll see that the
Georgia 6th Congressional District is one of those Red-turning-to-Purple
districts that very likely will stay in the Republican herd after all is said
and done….. Also you’ll see that
getting into the guts of anything with Nate Silver will very quickly will get
you out into the weeds of polling, statistics
and regression, both mathematical and psychological…..
Nonetheless, this
much is very plain and easy to see: the
Georgia 6th is much more “REPUBLICAN”
than the 43rd NYC Council District in Brooklyn….. So, if the by far leading Democrat, Jon Ossoff, wins by obtaining 50+ percent of the vote tomorrow, it will be very likely that 2017 is going to
be a very bad year for Republicans everywhere,
and that includes in the Brooklyn-NYCC 43rd. If Ossoff
gets significantly below his lowest polling-projection of 41% (still a number well
ahead of the rest of the pack), the picture for Democrats going forward is bleak, both in the Georgia 6h and elsewhere. More generally, anything that Nate Silver says is a good
indicator for Ossoff; just take the
opposite as a good indicator for the top Republican vote-getter in the Georgia 6th
Cong. Dist. Even more generally, the same is true about Republicans running in
2017 outside of the Georgia 6th, but to
a somewhat lesser extent of accuracy and over-all predictability.
Silver sees Ossoff getting somewhere BETWEEN the low-polling
number of 41% and a winning number of 50+%..... That means the prediction o a run-off in the
Georgia 6th. And that’s where
Silver takes a real deep dive into the weeds.
Nonetheless, a very important
number and easy to see number is the aggregate Republican vote compared to the
aggregate Dem vote. If the Republicans
hover around 50% (and, heaven forbid,
fall below it even a tiny bit), that’s
good for Ossoff and the Democrats
--- if the aggregate Democrat vote
is below 45%, then that’s bleak for
Ossoff and the Dems.
Here’s something that Silver said near the end of his
column --- perhaps as important as all of that number
crunching, the overall Democrat-Republican
bias in the district might skew any result on the final [run-off] election day. As a result, even a very strong performance for
Ossoff and the Democrats might not indicate a lot about the following run-off, even if it very closely falls short
of the 50+% needed to win on the first election day.
A similar fate might await any final GOP candidate running against
any final Democratic Party candidate for the City Council in the 43rd
Counc. Dist. First, it is not likely that any Democrat running in the 43rd Council District primary is likely to be as prohibitive a favorite as Jon Ossoff appears to be in Georgia's 6th Congressional District, nor will they sweep the Democrat City Council field on Primary Day by any ratio close to 40+% to 1%, 2% or 3%..... On the other hand, even if one of the GOP’s Three
Caballeros beats the other two like a
pair of balky mules, there just might
not be enough Republican and Conservative leaning folks to pull out in November so as to win in the general election, even if the ultimate Democrat candidate is an absolute "Black Swan" phenom with a name like Nancy
Tong or Khader El-Yateem.
If Ossoff comes in above 50% tomorrow a lot of things will change
ReplyDeleteGalewyn, there are no surprises coming out of the Republican Party in 2017, unless it's that none of the Republican candidates for City Council from Bay Ridge files enough valid signatures, making the Republican Line a blank.
ReplyDeleteBay Ridge is changing at the speed of light in ways that any of the old Bay Ridge hands wouldn't have a clue about.
Rev. Khader El-Yateem will bring in lots of younger more progressive voters and others from the establishment hard left to go along with his own growing base of Arab identity voters.
Gail, your trying too hard comparing the Georgia special election and possible runoff to the City Council primary and general for Gentile's spot.
ReplyDeleteRESPONSE: THE "NO DIFFFEECKULTT --- EEEASSSY ! ! !" EDITION
ReplyDeleteTO: "ANONYMOUS SAID... 8:55 PM"
READING THE NATE SILVER ARTICLE WAS RELATIVELY HARD COMPARED TO MAKING MY COMPARISON BETWEEN THE GEORGIA 6TH CD AND THE BROOKLYN 43RD NYCCD, WHICH AS I WROTE ABOVE WAS RELATIVELY "... EEEASSSY..." (rhymes with Francis of Assisi)
Some of my reader-followers, and even most of my regular "... Irregulars" take this stuff altogether too seriously.
UPDATE: THE "11:00 PM" EDITION
ReplyDeleteJON OSSOFF IS WAY AHEAD OF THE FIELD IN THE GEORGIA 6TH CD ELECTION.....
BUT HE WAS FURTHER AHEAD EARLIER; AND NOW IT LOOKS LIKE LESS THAN A 50/50 DEAL THAT HE BREAKS THE 50+% THRESHOLD TO WIN IT ALL TONIGHT.....
More info when it comes in.
UPDATE: THE "12:00 MIDNIGHT" EDITION
ReplyDeleteJON OSSOFF --- "REGARDLESS HOW [THE FINAL COUNT] COMES OUT TONIGHT... WE HAVE ALREADY WON A VICTORY FOR THE AGES..."
AND CNN PROJECTED A RUN-OFF BETWEEN DEMOCRAT JON OSSOFF AND REPUBLICAN KAREN HANDEL
As vote totals continued to come in near Midnight -- Ossoff's percentage had fallen below 50%: and the NY TIMES totals were "... Jon Ossoff... Dem... 88,562... 48.6% --- Karen Handel... Rep... 35,502... 19.5%..." [with 84% of the precincts reporting].
At about 12:07 PM, CNN reported similar numbers with 95% of the districts reporting.
UPDATE: THE "SPIN ZONE" EDITION
ReplyDeleteTHE "FIRST ROUND" OF THE GEORGIA SPECIAL ELECTION TO FILL THE CONGRESSIONAL SEAT OF HHS SECRETARY TOM PRICE, A REPUBLICAN, GAVE ALL SIDES SOMETHING TO CROW ABOUT --- AND EQUALLY IMPORTANT, >>>TO SPIN IT<<< TO FIT THEIR PET NARRATIVE(S)
MOST REPUBLICANS ARE CALLING THIS A WAKE-UP CALL, BUT PRESIDENT TRUMP IS SPINNING IT AS A "VICTORY" --- BUT SO ARE MOST OF THE DEMOCRATS
That's what happens when a candidate, like Jon Ossoff, goes into the last few days looking like a winner..... Last night was a lot like Election Night 2016, with the Democrats looking like clear winners early and the GOP chipping away, chipping away, chipping away as the numbers kept coming in....
Trump's Tweets were definitely "punching down" by the President; however, maybe they were part of what it took to hold off an outright Ossoff victory last night. As it was, Ossoff attained an "almost" outright win with 48.1%; and his nearest GOP opponent, Karen Handel, had only 19.8%.
So, on the day after both sides can probably make good arguments how their side won.
If what Nate Silver had to say in his last pre-election article (cited above in my post) is to be completely credited --- Handel is likely to win the June 20th run-off and Ossoff is likely to lose, but it is very close to a 50/50 deal in the run-off.
Here're the NY Times' numbers for yesterday's top vote-getters in the Ga. 6th Cong. Dist.:
"... Ossoff... Dem.... 92,390... 48.1%
Karen Handel... Rep.... 37,993... 19.8
Bob Gray... Rep.... 20,755... 10.8
Dan Moody... Rep.... 16,994.. 8.8
Judson Hill... Rep.... 16,848 8.8
Others... .... 7,104 3.7
100% reporting (210 of 210 precincts)"