FBI released a bunch of HRC’s E-mails in the middle of the night Sunday with no accompanying news release or synopsis --- More classified material found among HRC'S E-mails previously thought to have been missing --- More Sec/State E-mails found, not previously known to have been missing, and not part of Sec/State Clinton’s official E-mails turned over to/by State Department, and at least one of those E-mails was classified
“The FBI states it found ‘that hostile foreign actors successfully gained access to the personal email accounts of individuals associated with [and with] whom Clinton was in regular contact and, in doing so, obtained emails sent to or received by Clinton on her personal account.’…" --- NEWSMAX, 1/9/17
According to Newsmax, “The FBI late Sunday night released additional documents related to the investigation into Democratic presidential nominee Hillary Clinton's use of a private email server, posting the information on its website and doing so without sending out a release or announcing the move…. WikiLeaks reported the news first….” (See “FBI Releases More Hillary Emails, Says 'Hostile Foreign Actors' Accessed” by Solange Reyner, 1/8/17, Newsmax/ Newsfront [http://www.newsmax.com/Newsfront/hillary-clinton-investigation-fbi-investigative/2017/01/08/id/767425/]).
Also according to the Newsmax report, the new material released by the FBI was in five batches and was recovered from computers and other devices turned over to the FBI by various Hillary Clinton "associates".....
Well the Golden Globes dont seem to share Newsmax view.
ReplyDeleteUPDATE & BACKFILL: THE “FBI WEEKEND DOCUMENT DROP SHOWS DETAILS OF FBI-STATE DEPARTMENT FIGHT OVER CLASSSIFICATION” EDITION
ReplyDeleteFBI ARGUED THAT STATE DEPARTMENT FAILED TO PROPERLY CLASSIFY A POST-BENGHAZI E-MAIL ON HRC’S PERSONNAL SERVER THAT COULD DISCLOSE METHODS, OPERATIONS AND PERSONNEL
ACCORDING TO POLITICO --- NEWLY-RELEASED FBI E-MAILS & MEMOS ALSO CONTAINED OTHER DETAILS ABOUT THE HRC E-MAIL PROBE THAT HAD NOT PREVIOUSLY BEEN REPORTED AND/OR HAD RECEIVED LITTLE ATTENTION
According to a report in Politico, “Newly-released records about the Hillary Clinton email investigation shed new light on an early dispute between the FBI and the State Department over the classification of an email discussing the aftermath of the 2012 Benghazi attacks…. The 299 pages of internal FBI records, apparently released over the weekend on the FBI's Freedom of Information Act page, describe the bureau's reaction to State's protest of an FBI decision to classify a November 2012 State email discussing arrests in the Benghazi attacks…. The email was the first from Clinton's private account and server to be publicly identified as ‘SECRET,’ fueling arguments that Clinton and State had been careless in handling sensitive information.” (See “New Clinton email files detail FBI-State tussle over Benghazi message….” by Josh Gerstein, 1/9/17, Politico [http://www.politico.com/story/2017/01/new-clinton-emails-fbi-state-233343]).
That Gerstein-Politico article went on to state the following: “…. Notations applied to the message when it was reviewed in 2015 show it was classified because of the potential impact on U.S. relations overseas. However, the newly-disclosed FBI communications messages show one official there argued that the message should actually be classified based on its potential to disclose intelligence ‘sources and methods’—a designation that could have raised red flags with the press and on Capitol Hill…. ‘The redaction lists “interference with foreign relations as the rationale.” The crux of States [sic] argument is they know better what will impact foreign relations and there is no longer a government in place in Libya, the unidentified FBI official wrote to Michelle Jupina, the FBI Assistant Director for Records Management. ’The more appropriate rationale is ‘sources and methods.’ While the email does not name the particular official, this might be deduced and, given the threat of violence in the region, any surmise could be fatal for whoever cooperated with us. State will say no one will know if it is redacted, but that is not how classification works.’…"
What's the Golden Globes and who is that creep Merrill Shreep?
ReplyDeleteMeryl Streep is a self-indulgent bitch, who was working the crowd by preaching to the Hollywood choir
ReplyDeleteWhere are Walter Dies and Dick Nixon now that we really need them
Let's re-empanel the HUAC and start by investigating what's up with Hollywood being so out of step with real Americans
how come no republican judges on the ballot in the last election?
ReplyDeleteAsk State Senator Martin Golden
ReplyDeleteI know who Nixon and HUAC are but who the hell is Walter Dies?
ReplyDeleteWalter dies, Martin dies, everybody dies eventually; maybe, I meant Martin Dies, Jr.
ReplyDeleteDo you remember the 'Hollywood Ten' testifying about un-American activities in the movie industry?