Governmental Nuclear Options — The President’s Emerging and Emergent Threat of Illegal Immigration “Reform” — The Counter-force Threat — Congressional Removal of the President AND the Vice President
CONGRESS MUST IMMEDIATELY THREATEN THE PRESIDENCY OF BARACK HUSSEIN OBAMA IF HE MAKES A SINGLE UNCONSTITUTIONAL MOVE TO USURP THE POWER OF CONGRESS
The new leadership of both Houses of the Republican-controlled Congress need to place Impeachment of the President on the table ASAP — Even before the President attempts to act illegally on Immigration — The Congress needs to signal that the entire next session will be fully invested in Impeachment Proceedings ahead of all other matters
The Republican-dominated Congress needs to discuss its authority to utilize Article II, Section 1, Clause 6 of the Constitution to simultaneously remove the President and Vice President of the United States under various circumstances
It should be axiomatic that any unilateral move by President Obama to legalize any of the illegal invaders of the United States would be deemed a “high crime and misdemeanor” by a majority of the Republican-controlled House of Representatives. In such an event, an interim Impeachment Committee should be named in the “lame duck” session of the House to do preliminary work on charges, in order that the new House will be able to hit the deck running on those matters. In addition, the “lame duck” House should issue its own Declaration(s) and Order(s) to all Federal Agencies that the President’s unlawful and Impeachable actions and orders are a “Null and Void” usurpation of Congressional authority.
Simultaneous to any Impeachment proceedings, Pursuant to Article II, Section 1, Clause 6 of the Constitution of the United States the Congress should act to immediately remove the President and Vice President, and to declare that neither the Twenty-fifth Amendment nor any other amendment to the Constitution has application to the circumstance of the simultaneous removal of the President and the Vice President. Furthermore, the two Republican-dominated Houses of Congress needs to name and announce what Officer shall then act as President, and such Officer shall act accordingly, until the "Disability by Impeachment" of President Obama has been be removed, or a new President shall be elected.
Under the circumstance of President Obama’s incapacity due to Impeachment by the House, Vice President Joseph Biden simultaneously needs to be removed, because of his medical history of sever brain damage due to trauma and brain surgery, resulting in repeated instances of public neurological breakdowns manifest by verbal and other anomalies.
Upon such actions by the Republican-controlled Congress, the Joint Chiefs of Staff and the heads of all Executive Agencies need to be notified of the name of the new Executive Officer of the United States. Any officer or member of the armed services or other Federal Agencies not acceding to the new chain of command under the new Executive Officer named pursuant to Article II, Section 1, Clause 6 of the Constitution should be removed forthwith.
Upon removal of the President and Vice President pursuant to Article II, Section 1, Clause 6 of the Constitution, normal impeachment proceedings can be completed in due course.
ReplyDeleteblah blah blah blah
Once you use the "I" word, you lose credibility. Plus we get stuck with Biden.
ReplyDeleteBTW: Today the Dow ended the highest its ever been. Triple of what it was when Bush left.
The FED is printing quadruple the money since Bush left
ReplyDeleteRESPONSE: THE "EVERYTHING IS ON THE TABLE" EDITION
ReplyDeleteYESTERDAY HOUSE SPEAKER BOEHNER SAID THAT EVERYTHING IS ON THE TABLE IF THE PRESIDENT ADDRESSES "MASS AMNESTY" WITH AN EXECUTIVE ORDER
My proposal is for "Impeachment, AND the immediate constitutional removal of both the President and the Vice President"
Even if Biden isn't removed for his brain damaged condition, a brain damaged President Biden is better than President Obama.
It even makes a catchy slogan "BIDEN FOR PRESIDENT IN 2015".
THE COMMENT PREVIOUSLY IN THIS SPACE WAS REMOVED BECAUSE IT CONSTITUTED "HATE SPEECH"
ReplyDeleteYou have again now deleted my comment refuting your preposterous statement above. I am no longer visiting this blog nor will I ever comment again. Your blog is a fraud. I hope your readership plummets.
ReplyDeleteThere once was a blogger named Gale;
Whose postings were filled with tall tales;
He'd tell you a story,
All sound and all fury,
Joe Hynes shoulda put him in jail.
Good bye.
RESPONSE: THE "WHAT SOME PEOPLE THINK" EDITION
ReplyDeleteCasual and dismissive references to things that are revered and respected can be hate speech; and in the instance of the censored material above, that was the case.
BACKFILL: THE “ANOTHER APPROACH” EDITION
ReplyDeleteSIMILAR ACTIONS AGAINST EXECUTIVE PROPOSED IN THE PAST
The approach of a simultaneous impeachment was suggested a couple of years ago. According to the author(s)/editor(s) of a blog called Push Back, “A United State’s Vice President has never once before in our US history been impeached. Similarly, a United State’s President and a Vice President have never before been impeached at the same time. That does not mean it can’t be done. Our Great Republic of the USA’s Sovereignty and National Security, and all of our Constitutional Freedoms are at stake....” (See “How To Impeach President Obama & VP Biden Simultaneously. It Takes a Day, a Majority + 219 Votes” 4/26/13, Push Back Now [http://pushbacknow.net/2013/04/26/iou/] [concept taken from “Twenty Questions About Impeaching A Vice President” by Dr. Mary Maxwell, 11/5/05
Global Research [http://www.globalresearch.ca/twenty-questions-about-impeaching-a-vice-president/1185]). The remainder of the article goes through the steps that could/would/might be necessary to accomplish the simultaneous impeachment.