Politicker reports "...Weiner has consistently denied having a sex addition..."

Colin Campbell's "SUGGESTED READING..."  Farrelly Brothers edition ?

Does Weiner have a "Hedwig problem" the way Hedwig had a weiner problem ?

This morning I looked at the  Daily Read in Politicker at about 9:25 AM and saw this, "Anthony Weiner has consistently denied having a sex addition [sic]...." ( "... Morning Read: ‘Addiction Runs Deep’ " by Colin Campbell, 6/18/13, NY Observer/Politicker [http://politicker.com/2013/06/morning-read-addiction-runs-deep/]).  There are just so many things that could be, so I read on. But, soon it became obvioous to me -- it's a misprint [but it was still there as of 10:03 AM].

No doubt, Colin Campbell meant to say that "Anthony Weiner has consistently denied having a sex 'edition'..." in a reference to one of the former congresmman's congressional newsletters or other literature touting his accomplishments , talents and the like.  But, there was nothing that follwed in the piece that indicated that either.

I'm just a little confused about Colin's quote from Buzzfeed, "Addiction runs deep. It takes a lot of time and work,” said [ a sex therapist]. “I get the impression that he sees this as an anomaly, that he’s fine and fixed now. It doesn’t read to me that he is dealing with the issue and problem — he’s just presenting it as a mistake.”   I know  that 'he" refers to Weiner, but what was "broken" and needed to be "fixed"; and what is being presented as a "mistake" ?

Then again, maybe my original assumption that "sexual addition" was a misprint was wrong. Maybe Colin was correctly reporting that Anthony Weiner has had some kind of "sexual addition" and was denying it; or maybe Weiner didn't have any "sexual addition" and felt that he had a need to deny it, anyway.

Maybe, Weiner can clear it all up with some more pictures.