tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3872239785607728837.post2850076920638043067..comments2024-03-28T00:02:02.310-04:00Comments on The Brooklyn & Staten Island Independent GOP Fountainhead: Hillary Clinton's latest E-mails eruption -- Possibly the Worst, to date -- And its timing couldn't be worse, for IowaGalewyn Masseyhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/09210379476512207622noreply@blogger.comBlogger9125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3872239785607728837.post-34282091838921640692016-02-05T11:49:07.197-05:002016-02-05T11:49:07.197-05:00NOTE -- MY EDITORIAL RE-PLACEMENT: THE "I THO...NOTE -- MY EDITORIAL RE-PLACEMENT: THE "I THOUGHT BELONGED HERE" EDITION<br /><br />THE FOLLOWING COMMENT HAS BEEN MOVED FROM ITS ORIGINAL LOCATION ON THE UNRELATED COMMENTS THREAD TO THE POST IMMEDIATELY ABOVE [ITS PRIOR PLACEMENT IS MARKED]:<br /><br />"Anonymous said...<br />If you watched the dem debate tonight Hillary just created a new scandal.<br /><br />The transcripts !!<br /><br />Stay tuned<br />February 4, 2016 at 7:54 PM"<br /><br />I HOPE EVERYBODY AGREES -- THANK YOU FOR YOUR ATTENTIONGalewyn Masseyhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/09210379476512207622noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3872239785607728837.post-45590110134314666112016-02-04T10:44:33.984-05:002016-02-04T10:44:33.984-05:00UPDATE: THE "HILLARY GETS WA-PO PINOCCHIOS FO...UPDATE: THE "HILLARY GETS WA-PO PINOCCHIOS FOR HER E-MAIL EXCUSES" EDITION<br /><br />THE WASHINGTON POST'S "FACT CHECKER" FINDS THAT HILLARY'S EXPLANATIONS FOR HER E-MAIL MESS DON'T HOLD WATER -- SHE GETS TWO PINOCCHIOS [FOR NOW, UNTIL WE FIND OUT WHAT'S ACTUALLY IN THE "TOP SECRET" E-MAILS] <br /><br />WA-PO "FACT CHECKER" SAYS HILLARY'S EXCUSE THAT MATERIAL WAS NOT MARKED CLASSIFIED IS A "RED HERRING"<br /><br /><br />According to the Wa-Po's fact checker Glenn Kessler's lengthy analysis and critique on today's internet feed:<br />"Many readers continue to ask questions about Hillary Clinton’s private email set-up and whether or not she mishandled classified information. We have looked at this issue in the past, but the reader interest spiked again after the revelation that seven email chains contained “Top Secret” information and would not be released.... As the saga has dragged on, Clinton’s terminology has become ever more nuanced. When she first discussed her private-email arrangement in detail last March, her staff distributed a Q&A which flatly stated that no classified material was sent or received by Clinton at her private email address. Now she says the emails were not marked classified: 'When you receive information, of course, there has to be some markings, some indication that someone down the chain thought that this was classified and that was not the case.'... Finally, we come to Clinton’s excuse—that none of the emails were marked classified. This is a bit of a red herring. Anything marked classified could not be sent through an unclassified system—and officials are supposed to know enough about the sensitivity of communications to recognize material that could be considered classified under the executive order.... The Clinton campaign has argued that some intelligence officials are now engaged in a game of overclassification. That could well be the case; it’s impossible to know without access to emails that may not be released for years. But this debate would not even be taking place without the decision to set up the private server in the first place.... (See "How did ‘Top Secret’ emails end up on Hillary Clinton’s server?" by Glenn Kessler, 2/4/16, The Washington Post/ Fact Checker [https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/fact-checker/wp/2016/02/04/how-did-top-secret-emails-end-up-on-hillary-clintons-server/]).Galewyn Masseyhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/09210379476512207622noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3872239785607728837.post-45937148000170396502016-02-01T17:02:21.389-05:002016-02-01T17:02:21.389-05:00UPDATE: THE "IT DIDN'T TAKE HILLARY LONG ...UPDATE: THE "IT DIDN'T TAKE HILLARY LONG TO LASH BACK AT BERNIE" EDITION<br /><br />HILLARY SAYS SHE'S DISAPPOINTED THAT BERNIE SANDERS HAS TURNED "NEGATIVE" AND "PERSONAL"<br /><br />EVEN THOUGH BERNIE SANDERS WAS BEING ASKED DIRECT QUESTIONS BY MEMBERS OF THE MAIN STREAM MEDIA ABOUT THINGS LIKE BENGHAZI AND HILLARY'S E-MAIL PROBLEMS --- SHE DOESN'T LIKE THAT HE'S TALKING ABOUT THOSE THINGS OR EVEN HER RELATIONS WITH THE WALL STREET BANKS<br /><br />Earlier today on "Good Morning America" Hillary Clinton accused Bernie Sanders of "going negative" and "getting personal" in the latest stages of the campaign in Iowa and New Hampshire. She contrasted that to earlier in the campaign when she says Sanders stuck to the issues facing the American people.Galewyn Masseyhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/09210379476512207622noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3872239785607728837.post-71097527086817948942016-01-31T15:35:43.614-05:002016-01-31T15:35:43.614-05:00Trump wins in the endTrump wins in the endAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3872239785607728837.post-70970606714940546032016-01-31T14:17:10.200-05:002016-01-31T14:17:10.200-05:00Bernie wins tomorrow, next week in New Hampshire a...Bernie wins tomorrow, next week in New Hampshire and . . .Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3872239785607728837.post-61173572889432157862016-01-31T12:19:00.669-05:002016-01-31T12:19:00.669-05:00UPDATE: THE "AT LAST --- BERNIE SANDERS GET...UPDATE: THE "AT LAST --- BERNIE SANDERS GETS IT --- HILLARY'S E-MAILS SCANDAL IS 'A VERY SERIOUS ISSUE' " EDITION<br /><br />WHEN ASKED IF HIS AVOIDANCE OF THE ISSUE MEANT HE THOUGHT HILLARY CLINTON DID NOTHIG WRONG WITH HER E-MAILS --- BERNIE ANSWERED, "NO... NOPE, NOPE.... THAT IS... A VERY SERIOUS ISSUE... THERE IS A LEGAL PROCESS TAKING PLACE... "<br /><br />According to CNN --- "Democratic presidential candidate Bernie Sanders said Sunday that rival Hillary Clinton's email controversy is a 'very serious issue,' even though he has refused to attack the former secretary of state on that front.... Asked Sunday by CNN's Jake Tapper on 'State of the Union' whether voters should interpret his refusal to engage Clinton on the email issue to mean that Clinton did nothing wrong, Sanders replied with a firm, 'No.'... 'Nope, nope. That is not, I think, a fair assessment. That is, I think, a very serious issue,' Sanders said. 'There is a legal process taking place, I do not want to politicize that issue. It is not my style.'..." (See "Sanders: Clinton emails 'very serious issue'" by Jeremy Diamond, 1/31/16, CNN/ Politics [http://www.cnn.com/2016/01/31/politics/bernie-sanders-hillary-clinton-emails-iowa/index.html]).<br /><br />Bernie Sanders also told George Stephanopoulos on his ABC Sunday morning show that Hillary Clinton's E-mail problems were a serious matter, but that he didn't want to politicize it.Galewyn Masseyhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/09210379476512207622noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3872239785607728837.post-43032309155622915802016-01-31T11:10:50.083-05:002016-01-31T11:10:50.083-05:00Gail, why are you and everybody else ignoring the ...Gail, why are you and everybody else ignoring the 18 additional emails directly from the White House that are being withheld because of some kind of principle of deliberative or executive privilege? Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3872239785607728837.post-7845127062469333902016-01-31T03:40:23.508-05:002016-01-31T03:40:23.508-05:00Why does she always lie !!!!
Lie Lies Lies Why does she always lie !!!!<br /><br />Lie Lies Lies Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3872239785607728837.post-18119079435540192212016-01-31T01:46:37.920-05:002016-01-31T01:46:37.920-05:00Are we supposed to believe the timing of this is j...Are we supposed to believe the timing of this is just a coincidence?<br /><br />The White House takes a major shit all over the Clinton operation 2 days before Iowa.<br /><br />My sixth sense tells me that check from the Clinton foundation never got to the Obama library.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.com